Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Introduction This is the first empirical study carried out in the UK to examine the devasting impact of the policy to ban all gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender personnel under exemptive military laws and their resultant support needs as military veterans. The so-called “gay ban” policy was enforced with the rationale that homosexuality was incompatible with military service. Methods In the UK between 2021 and 2022, 15 LGBT + veterans took part in semi-structured interviews and 101 LGBT + veterans completed an online survey. The findings were triangulated to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of the “gay ban” policy. Results Three key overarching themes were identified: Emotional Impact, Changing to Adapt and Adapting to Change and Aftermath: Barriers to Help-Seeking. Conclusions Social cohesion, established during military service, was limited upon leaving the Armed Forces and LGBT + veterans reported feeling a loss of their identity and the ability to foster social relationships. The policy ban facilitated discrimination and harassment, causing emotional distress, mental ill health, social isolation and limited access to appropriate support following transition. Policy Implications Despite the lifting of the “gay ban” policy over 20 years ago, how inclusivity is represented in a historically heteronormative institution is unclear. The “gay ban” policy was weaponised with strategic power, leading to long-term, negative psychological consequences for those who were disempowered by the ban. Therefore, it is essential that confidence is restored, and that policy and institutional-level changes recognise the historical harm for the future of LGBT + military personnel and veterans. These findings will help to raise awareness and increase knowledge and, in turn, contribute to improving access and engagement with service provision and support.
Introduction This is the first empirical study carried out in the UK to examine the devasting impact of the policy to ban all gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender personnel under exemptive military laws and their resultant support needs as military veterans. The so-called “gay ban” policy was enforced with the rationale that homosexuality was incompatible with military service. Methods In the UK between 2021 and 2022, 15 LGBT + veterans took part in semi-structured interviews and 101 LGBT + veterans completed an online survey. The findings were triangulated to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of the “gay ban” policy. Results Three key overarching themes were identified: Emotional Impact, Changing to Adapt and Adapting to Change and Aftermath: Barriers to Help-Seeking. Conclusions Social cohesion, established during military service, was limited upon leaving the Armed Forces and LGBT + veterans reported feeling a loss of their identity and the ability to foster social relationships. The policy ban facilitated discrimination and harassment, causing emotional distress, mental ill health, social isolation and limited access to appropriate support following transition. Policy Implications Despite the lifting of the “gay ban” policy over 20 years ago, how inclusivity is represented in a historically heteronormative institution is unclear. The “gay ban” policy was weaponised with strategic power, leading to long-term, negative psychological consequences for those who were disempowered by the ban. Therefore, it is essential that confidence is restored, and that policy and institutional-level changes recognise the historical harm for the future of LGBT + military personnel and veterans. These findings will help to raise awareness and increase knowledge and, in turn, contribute to improving access and engagement with service provision and support.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.