Reviews in Digital Humanities 2022
DOI: 10.21428/3e88f64f.47ac01be
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editors' Note: November 2022

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Accordingly, Banerji's vituperation against 'simply listing a bunch of plays from the more melanated or non-English speaking worlds' needs to be read in light of the critique of 'white people… "decolonizing" everything' or, in more polished terms, decolonization as an infelicitous performative. 21 This critique further extends to decolonization theory itself, which has come under fire for its vacuity and potential for causing harm. Olúfẹ ḿi Táíwò belabours the point as to how much of the work that currently falls under decolonization can be achieved without the term and 'the histrionics that go with it'.…”
Section: Decolonization As An Infelicitous Performativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Accordingly, Banerji's vituperation against 'simply listing a bunch of plays from the more melanated or non-English speaking worlds' needs to be read in light of the critique of 'white people… "decolonizing" everything' or, in more polished terms, decolonization as an infelicitous performative. 21 This critique further extends to decolonization theory itself, which has come under fire for its vacuity and potential for causing harm. Olúfẹ ḿi Táíwò belabours the point as to how much of the work that currently falls under decolonization can be achieved without the term and 'the histrionics that go with it'.…”
Section: Decolonization As An Infelicitous Performativementioning
confidence: 99%