2012
DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2012.671805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educating Copacabana: a critical analysis of the “Second Half”, an Olympic education program of Rio 2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Projeto Rio 2016 was developed, implemented, and financed by the State Government, and was promoted as Rio's main The main strategy for developing sport/physical activity participation among the (young) population found in the bid document refers to increasing funding towards already existing federal government programs in this field. The main one, the Programa Segundo Tempo (English translation: Second Half Program) was, at the time, the flagship program of the Ministry of Sports for increasing sport participation among children and youth across the country, and has the concept of development through sport as its principal foundation (Knijnik & Tavares, 2012;Reis, Sousa-Mast, & Vieira, 2013). In fact, the program is supported by the UN, which highlights again its social development focus.…”
Section: Sport Participation and The Olympic Games 149mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projeto Rio 2016 was developed, implemented, and financed by the State Government, and was promoted as Rio's main The main strategy for developing sport/physical activity participation among the (young) population found in the bid document refers to increasing funding towards already existing federal government programs in this field. The main one, the Programa Segundo Tempo (English translation: Second Half Program) was, at the time, the flagship program of the Ministry of Sports for increasing sport participation among children and youth across the country, and has the concept of development through sport as its principal foundation (Knijnik & Tavares, 2012;Reis, Sousa-Mast, & Vieira, 2013). In fact, the program is supported by the UN, which highlights again its social development focus.…”
Section: Sport Participation and The Olympic Games 149mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A valuable tool aiding the introduction of children and teenagers to the world of values turns out to be an Olympic education which, along with the principle of fair play, makes it possible to merge with trends concerning modern theories of education [20,21]. As part of alternative education, it may appear as an integral part of teaching programs at various stages of schooling, proving its educational effectiveness [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government acknowledged sport as an instrument for legitimising dominant ideologies, in this case the dictatorial government project (Bueno, ). Such state‐based regulation still predominates (Knijnik and Tavares, ) and is a distinctive factor when analysing SfD programmes in Brazil (Reis et al, ). Subsequently, the military regime (initiated in 1964) used high performance sports, particularly football (Bueno, ), as a diversion to distract the population from domestic issues: the infamous ‘bread and circus’ approach (Soares Filho, ).…”
Section: Sport‐for‐developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, like other international SfD programmes, they have been criticised for not achieving their purported social benefits (de Moraes et al, 2017). Knijnik and Tavares (), for instance, argue that there is a significant gap between what is proposed in the policy and what happens on the ground. In addition, unlike some international examples (cf.…”
Section: Sport‐for‐developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%