Educational interventions to reduce nurse medication interruptions: A scoping review

Owen, Samantha; Menzies, Julie C; Pontefract, Sarah

doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105665

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding aligns with a recent study in France, which similarly found no impact of safety vest implementation on MAEs or interruption rates [ 64 ]. Therefore, we hypothesize that the significantly lower frequency of interruptions observed in our study may be attributed to the Hawthorn effect, whereby nurses modified their behaviour in response to being observed in a research setting [ 65 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical and economic impact of medication administration errors among neonates in neonatal intensive care units

Henry Basil,

Mohd Tahir,

Menon Premakumar

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite efforts in improving medication safety, medication administration errors are still common, resulting in significant clinical and economic impact. Studies conducted using a valid and reliable tool to assess clinical impact are lacking, and to the best of our knowledge, studies evaluating the economic impact of medication administration errors among neonates are not yet available. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the potential clinical and economic impact of medication administration errors in neonatal intensive care units and identify the factors associated with these errors. A national level, multi centre, prospective direct observational study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care units of five Malaysian public hospitals. The nurses preparing and administering the medications were directly observed. After the data were collected, two clinical pharmacists conducted independent assessments to identify errors. An expert panel of healthcare professionals assessed each medication administration error for its potential clinical and economic outcome. A validated visual analogue scale was used to ascertain the potential clinical outcome. The mean severity index for each error was subsequently calculated. The potential economic impact of each error was determined by averaging each expert’s input. Multinomial logistic regression and multiple linear regression were used to identify factors associated with the severity and cost of the errors, respectively. A total of 1,018 out of 1,288 (79.0%) errors were found to be potentially moderate in severity, while only 30 (2.3%) were found to be potentially severe. The potential economic impact was estimated at USD 27,452.10. Factors significantly associated with severe medication administration errors were the medications administered intravenously, the presence of high-alert medications, unavailability of a protocol, and younger neonates. Moreover, factors significantly associated with moderately severe errors were intravenous medication administration, younger neonates, and an increased number of medications administered. In the multiple linear regression analysis, the independent variables found to be significantly associated with cost were the intravenous route of administration and the use of high-alert medications. In conclusion, medication administration errors were judged to be mainly moderate in severity costing USD 14.04 (2.22–22.53) per error. This study revealed important insights and highlights the need to implement effective error reducing strategies to improve patient safety among neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical and economic impact of medication administration errors among neonates in neonatal intensive care units

Henry Basil,

Mohd Tahir,

Menon Premakumar

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Prevalence and factors associated with medication administration errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: A multicentre, nationwide direct observational study

Henry Basil,

Premakumar,

Mhd Ali

et al. 2024

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim(s)To determine the prevalence of medication administration errors and identify factors associated with medication administration errors among neonates in the neonatal intensive care units.DesignProspective direct observational study.MethodsThe study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care units of five public hospitals in Malaysia from April 2022 to March 2023. The preparation and administration of medications were observed using a standardized data collection form followed by chart review. After data collection, error identification was independently performed by two clinical pharmacists. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with medication administration errors.ResultsA total of 743 out of 1093 observed doses had at least one error, affecting 92.4% (157/170) neonates. The rate of medication administration errors was 68.0%. The top three most frequently occurring types of medication administration errors were wrong rate of administration (21.2%), wrong drug preparation (17.9%) and wrong dose (17.0%). Factors significantly associated with medication administration errors were medications administered intravenously, unavailability of a protocol, the number of prescribed medications, nursing experience, non‐ventilated neonates and gestational age in weeks.ConclusionMedication administration errors among neonates in the neonatal intensive care units are still common. The intravenous route of administration, absence of a protocol, younger gestational age, non‐ventilated neonates, higher number of medications prescribed and increased years of nursing experience were significantly associated with medication administration errors.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThe findings of this study will enable the implementation of effective and sustainable interventions to target the factors identified in reducing medication administration errors among neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit.Reporting MethodWe adhered to the STROBE checklist.Patient or Public ContributionAn expert panel consisting of healthcare professionals was involved in the identification of independent variables.

show abstract

Experiences of clinical nurses with medication interruption: A systematic review and qualitative meta‐synthesis

Wang,

Ding,

Zhu

et al. 2024

Worldviews Ev Based Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundManaging medication interruptions is considered one of the biggest dilemmas for nurses in clinical settings. To improve medication safety, it was imperative to conduct a systematic review to get a deeper understanding of nurses' experiences with medication interruptions.AimsA systematic review and qualitative meta‐synthesis aimed to explore clinical nurses' experiences of interruption during medication in hospitals.MethodsSystematic searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library from inception to January 2024. The search strategy included four groups of keywords: (1) qualitative research, (2) nurses, (3) medication interruption, and (4) experience. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used to assess the quality of the studies. Meta‐ethnography was utilized to synthesize the findings of the included studies.ResultsNine articles published between 2012 and 2023 were included; the number of participants varied from 5 to 40, aged 20–68 years, and the majority were female. Four synthesized findings were identified as follows: (1) an inevitable part of the routine, (2) a decision‐making process, (3) working in a minefield, and (4) coping with interruption.Linking Evidence to ActionNurses embraced interruptions as an inherent component of clinical care. Previous experience and nursing culture, encompassing personal and professional aspects, significantly influence nurses' attitudes toward medication interruptions. It is crucial to incorporate the distinctive work experiences of nurses into techniques aimed at efficiently handling interruptions in future research. The registration number in PROSPERO is CRD42023470276.

show abstract

Educational interventions to reduce nurse medication interruptions: A scoping review

Cited by 3 publications

References 35 publications

Clinical and economic impact of medication administration errors among neonates in neonatal intensive care units

Clinical and economic impact of medication administration errors among neonates in neonatal intensive care units

Prevalence and factors associated with medication administration errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: A multicentre, nationwide direct observational study

Experiences of clinical nurses with medication interruption: A systematic review and qualitative meta‐synthesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About