2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG-TCNet: An Accurate Temporal Convolutional Network for Embedded Motor-Imagery Brain–Machine Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 presents the classification accuracy and kappa scores of each subject for several state-of-the-art MI-EEG algorithms employing a subject-specific approach on the BCI Competition IV-2a dataset. The suggested MBEEGNET and MBShallowConvNet, EEG-TCNet [ 30 ], both fixed and variable EEGNet [ 16 , 30 ], ShallowConvNet [ 16 ], and Incep-EEGNet [ 29 ] are the approaches compared. MBEEGNET and MBShallowConvNet, the proposed models, have an accuracy of 82.01% and 81.15%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 presents the classification accuracy and kappa scores of each subject for several state-of-the-art MI-EEG algorithms employing a subject-specific approach on the BCI Competition IV-2a dataset. The suggested MBEEGNET and MBShallowConvNet, EEG-TCNet [ 30 ], both fixed and variable EEGNet [ 16 , 30 ], ShallowConvNet [ 16 ], and Incep-EEGNet [ 29 ] are the approaches compared. MBEEGNET and MBShallowConvNet, the proposed models, have an accuracy of 82.01% and 81.15%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 30 ], the authors used temporal convolutional networks (TCNs) with EEGnet to boost the performance accuracy. A standard causal convolution can only expand the size of its receptive field linearly as the network depth increases, which can be a significant drawback because a big receptive field size requires either an exceptionally deep network or one with a very large kernel size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, researching compact yet accurate algorithms [7], [17] and designing low-power processors with high capabilities [18] has become an emerging trend. Most of the MI-BMI models, particularly CNNs, are too demanding for low-power MCUs [19]. TPCT [20] reached the state-of-the-art (SoA) accuracy of 88.87% on the BCI Competition IV-2a dataset [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep neural networks (DNNs) have demonstrated impressive results in many fields, from outperforming humans in computer vision [17], vastly improving solutions for image processing [18] and speech recognition [19], natural language processing [20], large-scale recommender systems [21], and data analysis for sensors such as radar [22] that are not directly understandable by humans. Especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are largely applied in the image domain, but also for MI-BMI classification achieving state-of-the-art (SoA) accuracy [23]- [26]. However, they tend to grow in numbers of parameters making them often unfit for deployment on low-power low-cost MCUs, and require a large amount of training data to prevent overfitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 https://github.com/pulp-platform/multispectral-riemannian Q-EEGNet [13] EEGNet [24] S. ConvNet [23] MSFBCNN [25] EEG-TCNet [26] FBCSP [40] MRC-Mr. Wolf [39] MRC-Vega…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%