2016
DOI: 10.1108/jfc-04-2015-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EFCC and the politics of combating corruption in Nigeria (2003-2012)

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to assess if the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has been effective in combating corruption in Nigeria from 2003-2012. Design/methodology/approach The paper adopted a documentary analytical approach. Findings The organization has not been effective in combating corruption in Nigeria. Research limitations/implications The study is between 2003-2012. Practical implications There is a need to correct those identified inhibitors that undermined the Commission’s capac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the major challenges (among several others) responsible for the spread and prevalence of corruption in the country is the inability of the anti-corruption agencies to successfully conduct investigation and gather evidence to prosecute corruption allegations in the country (Aluko and Adesopo, 2003). Due to secretive nature of corruption and the category of individuals involved, the anti-corruption agencies in Nigeria have not been able to conduct meaningful investigations or gather evidences enough to prosecute those alleged of embezzlement, fraud, mismanagement of public resources and other corrupt practices (Albert and Okoli, 2016).…”
Section: Anti-corruption Crusade In Nigeriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major challenges (among several others) responsible for the spread and prevalence of corruption in the country is the inability of the anti-corruption agencies to successfully conduct investigation and gather evidence to prosecute corruption allegations in the country (Aluko and Adesopo, 2003). Due to secretive nature of corruption and the category of individuals involved, the anti-corruption agencies in Nigeria have not been able to conduct meaningful investigations or gather evidences enough to prosecute those alleged of embezzlement, fraud, mismanagement of public resources and other corrupt practices (Albert and Okoli, 2016).…”
Section: Anti-corruption Crusade In Nigeriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unethical behavior of some of the Nigerian politician makes fraudulent practices in the Nigerian public sector perennial. Another factor may be attributed to bias application of the laws as the anti-graft bodies turn to be a political watchdog and treat to the opposition, acting contrary to the provision of the laws (Albert & Okoli, 2016). These unethical behaviors exhibited by the Nigerian politician become a treat to the economic development of the nation.…”
Section: Challenges Of Combating Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the efforts is the establishment of the Institute of Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) by the year 2000 and the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) after two years, mainly to address the problem of financial scandal (Mansor, 2015b). The government has been struggling to reduce the level of fraudulent practices through legal measures and integrity, yet little success is recorded, between 2003 -2012 the government of Nigeria was estimated to lose over $500 billion to corrupt elites (Albert & Okoli, 2016). Another factor that remained a challenge in preventing fraudulent behavior is the lack of political willingness.…”
Section: Challenges Of Combating Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, investigating corrupt practices requires continuous monitoring and effective law enforcement with an honest judiciary. However, neither the evaluative report of EFCC nor ICPC has been impressive in curbing corruption and instituting fairness (Albert and Okoli, 2016). The reasons are not only obvious but also empirically established ranging from political interference, to a reluctant/and or weak judiciary through manipulation of resource allocation and appointments to key positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%