2018
DOI: 10.15381/rivep.v29i3.14169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efectos de la criopreservación sobre las subpoblaciones espermáticas en caprinos

Abstract: El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la criopreservación en la presencia de subpoblaciones de espermatozoides, según la motilidad, en eyaculados de macho cabrío utilizando el sistema de Análisis de Semen Asistido por Computador (CASA). Los parámetros de motilidad se analizaron con análisis de componentes principales (PCA) donde evidenciaron la mayor varianza, reduciendo así el número de variables. En la evaluación de 23 738 espermatozoides en fresco, la subpoblación (Sp) 1 consistió en espermat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the semen pH was seven in one male and eight in the other. The ejaculation of the evaluated males was carried out in October when at the end of the rainy season and the beginning of the forage availability; however, the sperm quality of the males was lower (224106 sperm mL 1 and 16106 sperm mL 1 ) than that established for this species (2,500 to 3,000106 sperm mL 1 ) (Hernández-Corredor et al, 2018). This can be explained in the following way (first) the males were recovering from the dry season where there was little available food, followed by the moment when the males were ejaculated, who had finished the riding period, and finally, for a male to ejaculate, previous training is needed to reduce their stress level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Finally, the semen pH was seven in one male and eight in the other. The ejaculation of the evaluated males was carried out in October when at the end of the rainy season and the beginning of the forage availability; however, the sperm quality of the males was lower (224106 sperm mL 1 and 16106 sperm mL 1 ) than that established for this species (2,500 to 3,000106 sperm mL 1 ) (Hernández-Corredor et al, 2018). This can be explained in the following way (first) the males were recovering from the dry season where there was little available food, followed by the moment when the males were ejaculated, who had finished the riding period, and finally, for a male to ejaculate, previous training is needed to reduce their stress level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…47 The differences in the size of the head between the sperm in the different treatments occur because the sperm has modified the function of the membrane and this sperm will have lost or gained part of their intracellular content as a result of the osmotic change. 48 This explains the excessive growth of the sperm cells in the face of physical-chemical changes and the physiological adaptation of the cells to the different stressors of the components that add them in each process. It should be noted that the treatment of EPp and EPr have higher values than those taken in the fresh sample, this can be justified in the role that the biopharmaceutical performs when included in sheep semen.…”
Section: Sperm Motility Depends On Endogenous and Exogenous Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%