2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-86922013000300007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeitos agudos de diferentes métodos de treinamento com pesos sobre o gasto energético em homens treinados

Abstract: Introduction: The Weight training has been widely used as strategy of reduction and weight control, so the energy expenditure (EE) contributes significantly to this process. Objective: To compare the acute effects of the circuit method (CM) with the traditional method (TM) on the EE. Methods: This research had a randomized crossover design; the sample consisted of ten adult men recreationally trained aged between 18 to 29 years. There were two experimental sessions with seven-day wash out: in CM the exercises … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other investigation of work and duration matched running and cycling, despite slight differences in VO 2 as seen here, there were also similar energy costs (Scott et al, 2006). This is also the case with different work matched resistance training approaches (Scott, 2006;Aniceto et al, 2013). There were no significant between condition differences for either aerobic or anaerobic energy expenditures, although it did appear that anaerobic energy expenditure during the exercise periods exceeded aerobic energy expenditure for the leg press conditions, and this was reversed in the recumbent cycle ergometer condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In other investigation of work and duration matched running and cycling, despite slight differences in VO 2 as seen here, there were also similar energy costs (Scott et al, 2006). This is also the case with different work matched resistance training approaches (Scott, 2006;Aniceto et al, 2013). There were no significant between condition differences for either aerobic or anaerobic energy expenditures, although it did appear that anaerobic energy expenditure during the exercise periods exceeded aerobic energy expenditure for the leg press conditions, and this was reversed in the recumbent cycle ergometer condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Thus due to the different characteristics of different types of exercise (aerobic exercise and with weights) it is possible that the intensity of both methods has not been able to generate a sufficient blood redistribution. In addition, studies have reported similar outcomes in both methods for their variables such as muscle damage and the total energy expenditure when standardized protocols CWT and TM 20,36 . Additionally, it is believed that due to the CWT and TM exhibit the same volume and intensity, that was what resulted in not obtaining significant differences between the methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Considering that Aniceto et al 20 demonstrated that different methods of WT carried out with the same volume and intensity (total work) present similar energy expenditure, it is necessary to know the potential effects of WT on food consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is little research specifically examining this area, especially that which has controlled for effort and duration of exercise to examine the effects of modality. Work matched comparisons of different resistance training approaches (circuit style or traditional consecutive sets) show that O 2 consumption (aerobic energy expenditure during exercise and rest interval) and total energy expenditure is similar (Aniceto et al, 2013). Although, it is noteworthy that anaerobic energy expenditure estimated from production of blood lactate was higher in consecutive sets compared with circuit style of resistance training suggesting CO 2 production may be higher (Aniceto et al, 2013).…”
Section: Other Considerations: O2 Consumption Co2 Production and Enmentioning
confidence: 99%