1976
DOI: 10.2527/jas1976.433665x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect Monensin on Performance of Cattle Forage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
37
1
16

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
37
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…This situation originated from the decreasing forage quality as the season advanced. Similar results with forage quality decreasing live weight gains in grazed animals were reported by other researchers (27,28). In grazing experiments, as the forage quality decreased, the response to supplementation always increased (29).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This situation originated from the decreasing forage quality as the season advanced. Similar results with forage quality decreasing live weight gains in grazed animals were reported by other researchers (27,28). In grazing experiments, as the forage quality decreased, the response to supplementation always increased (29).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The depression of fiber digestion can be reasonably explained by the inhibitory effect of monensin on rumen cellulolytic bacteria, mainly ruminococci and butyrivibria (Dennis et al 1981;Henderson et al 1981). As it is known that monensin increases the productive efficiency of ruminants on both high-concentrate (review Galyean and Owens 1988) and roughage diets (Potter et al 1976;Faulkner et al 1985), we must assume that unfavourable effect of monensin on digestion of cellulose is compensated for by its benefitial effect on digestion of other components of plant matter and/or by increased post-ruminal cellulose digestion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avaliando a suplementação de monensina sódica via sal mineral para novilhos mantidos em pastagem de colonião, ANDRADE et al (1996) também não encontraram efeito significativo no ganho de peso dos animais que receberam o ionóforo. Por outro lado, existem trabalhos (POTTER et al, 1976;BOLING et al, 1977;SPEARS et al, 1984) nos quais foram constatados maiores ganhos de peso médios diários em animais suplementados com lasalocida sódica ou monensina sódica em pastagem cultivada quando comparados aos não suplementados.…”
unclassified
“…GOODRICH et al (1984), analisando os resultados de 228 testes, encontraram redução média de 6,4% no consumo de alimentos nos animais que receberam monensina na dieta. Menores consumos de MS por animais que receberam ionóforos também foram constatados por PERRY et al (1976), POTTER et al (1976) e BERGER et al (1981.…”
unclassified