2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13033-016-0090-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of accreditation on length of stay in psychiatric inpatients: pre-post accreditation medical record comparison

Abstract: BackgroundAn interest in hospital accreditation is growing rapidly among many countries to enhance the quality of health care services. The literature showed a positive association between accreditation and some processes of health care. One of the main factors that influence bed availability is the length of hospital stay (LOS), which is considered as an important indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric hospitalization. We aimed to investigate whether hospital accreditation drives improvements for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies consistently indicated a lack of relationship between accreditation and hospital 30-day readmission rate in various contexts [ 21 , 84 , 89 , 90 ], whereas other studies presented contradictory effects on healthcare-associated infections [ 25 , 85 , 91 , 92 ]. However, studies reported a consistently positive impact of accreditation on hospital [ 84 , 86 , 89 , 93 ] and departmental [ 91 , 94 , 95 ] patient length of stay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies consistently indicated a lack of relationship between accreditation and hospital 30-day readmission rate in various contexts [ 21 , 84 , 89 , 90 ], whereas other studies presented contradictory effects on healthcare-associated infections [ 25 , 85 , 91 , 92 ]. However, studies reported a consistently positive impact of accreditation on hospital [ 84 , 86 , 89 , 93 ] and departmental [ 91 , 94 , 95 ] patient length of stay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the administrative database did not include some important variables that may affect prolonged LOS, such as detailed clinical information and clinical ratings, although the database has a large sample size and detailed procedural information. Indeed, the database also did not include variables reported to affect LOS: hospital accreditation; use of community care; community activities; and social status, such as living alone . Third, we used prolonged LOS as a proxy measure and believe most patients were discharged as they reached their treatment end‐point; however, some of them may have been discharged for other reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately more than two third of the impact studies were carried out in the developed nations ( n = 49). A total of 22 research studies on impact of accreditation were carried out in the USA (Gebhart et al , 2014; Kwon et al , 2013; Lichtman et al , 2011; Lutfiyya et al , 2009; Menachemi et al , 2008; Morton et al , 2014; Ross et al , 2008; Schmaltz et al , 2011; Telem et al , 2015; Thornlow and Merwin, 2009; Wagner et al , 2012) and Saudi Arabia (Aboshaiqah et al , 2016; Almasabi and Thomas, 2017; Al-Awa et al , 2011a, 2011b, 2012; Al-Qahtani et al , 2012; Al Shammari et al , 2015; Al-Sughayir, 2016, 2017; Seada, 2012). There were 13 studies that assessed the impact of accreditation in low or middle income countries (Ajarmah and Hashem, 2015; Al Tehewy et al , 2009; Bahadori, 2018; El-Jardali et al , 2008, 2011, 2014; Haj-Ali et al , 2014; Hayati et al , 2010; Kim et al , 2010; Mohebbifar et al , 2017; Quimbo et al , 2008; Saif, 2016; Yildiz and Kaya, 2014) as per the World Bank classifications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%