30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-3025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Airfoil Shape and Reynolds Number on Leading Edge Vortex Shedding in Unsteady Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This variation was documented in Ref. 38 Figure 4. Since we are only examining the results until the point of LEV formation, the LEV shedding in the theoretical model is "turned off".…”
Section: Iiia1 Calibration Of Lesp Crit With Re Vmagmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This variation was documented in Ref. 38 Figure 4. Since we are only examining the results until the point of LEV formation, the LEV shedding in the theoretical model is "turned off".…”
Section: Iiia1 Calibration Of Lesp Crit With Re Vmagmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is interesting, however, that the reduced frequency of response is nearly the same value and independent of critical LESP. In earlier research, Ramesh et al [51] have shown that airfoils with more rounded leading edges can support more suction, and hence have higher values of critical LESP. For example, a flat plate at Re = 1, 000 has LESP crit = 0.11, and a NACA0015 airfoil at the same Reynolds number has LESP crit = 0.19.…”
Section: Parametric Study D: Effect Of Change In Airfoil Shape (Lesp mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The approximation of downward transport of vorticity, as employed in our study similar to that of Schnipper et al (2009), was based on estimating the vorticity production from Tietjens et al (1957), which does not account for any effect of splitting mechanism in the wake of bluff bodies. As also detailed in the study by Ramesh et al (2012), with regard to unsteady effects on leading edge vortex shedding with increasing Re, the vorticity distribution and thereby the circulation is inherently dependent on the wake-induced downwash velocity in parallel and normal 0.33T 0.45T 0.57T 0.69T 0.81T 0.93T directions to the foil chord. This wake-induced velocity at Re = 4000 will not be similar to the approximation (Ramesh et al 2012) that holds at Re = 1000 due to the onset of unsteady splitting mechanisms in the near wake.…”
Section: Formation Mechanism Of Rbvk + 2p Mode and Symmetric Bifurcat...mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As also detailed in the study by Ramesh et al (2012), with regard to unsteady effects on leading edge vortex shedding with increasing Re, the vorticity distribution and thereby the circulation is inherently dependent on the wake-induced downwash velocity in parallel and normal 0.33T 0.45T 0.57T 0.69T 0.81T 0.93T directions to the foil chord. This wake-induced velocity at Re = 4000 will not be similar to the approximation (Ramesh et al 2012) that holds at Re = 1000 due to the onset of unsteady splitting mechanisms in the near wake. This attributes directly to the inaccuracy in estimating circulation of the leading edge, or boundary layer, vortices (i.e.…”
Section: Formation Mechanism Of Rbvk + 2p Mode and Symmetric Bifurcat...mentioning
confidence: 85%