2008
DOI: 10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Basic Motivational Factors on Construction Workforce Productivity in Turkey/Pagrindinių Motyvacijos Veiksnių Įtaka Statybos Produktyvumui Turkijoje

Abstract: Abstract. Human resource today has a strategic role for productivity increase of any organization, and this makes it superior in the industrial competition. With the effective and optimum usage of it, all the advantages supplied by the productivity growth can be obtained. This usage is just possible by establishing clear and understandable criteria for the factors affecting labour. Therefore, it is aimed in this study that the factors influencing construction labour productivity in Turkey are determined, defin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
168
2
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
168
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Turkish respondents' score is approximately 1.5 times higher than the score of the American respondents. This finding is not surprising in the current state of the Turkish construction industry, where most labourers are not formally trained; most of them are unskilled and underqualified (DPT Report 2004;Kazaz et al 2008). According to Tokman and Eryilmaz (2004), Agrali (2006), and Polat (2008c), the inadequacy of the Turkish construction labour force is much as much a problem for the construction industry in general as it is for the precast concrete industry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Turkish respondents' score is approximately 1.5 times higher than the score of the American respondents. This finding is not surprising in the current state of the Turkish construction industry, where most labourers are not formally trained; most of them are unskilled and underqualified (DPT Report 2004;Kazaz et al 2008). According to Tokman and Eryilmaz (2004), Agrali (2006), and Polat (2008c), the inadequacy of the Turkish construction labour force is much as much a problem for the construction industry in general as it is for the precast concrete industry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast to its significant impact on national economies and people's lives, the construction industry is typically characterized by labour intensive technology, hard labour conditions, low productivity, and high risks (Kazaz et al 2008). These problematic business conditions mainly result from the slow integration of technological advances and industrialization principles such as computer-aided construction, automation, standardization, modularization, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need for contractors to have increased participation from the workers in order to have increased organisational effectiveness. Kazaz et al (2008) posit that human resource has a strategic role for productivity increase of any organisation and this makes it superior in industrial competition.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic inventory control and documentation reduce time consumption for labour to retrieve materials [41]. Other effects are on time delivery of material increases work progress, used appropriate quality material speed up finishing time, on time material procurement reduces idling time and reasonable changes reduces extra time for adjustment of resources [35][36][37]42]. …”
Section: Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From positive effects, effective material management has a positive impact on time optimization, cost saving, quality maximization, productivity improvement and waste minimization, [1][2][3][32][33][34]. On the other hand, ineffective material management has negative effects on project performance such as time delay, cost overrun, poor quality, loss of productivity and excessive waste generation [2,8,11,14,[35][36][37]. However, in the context of this paper, the criteria are termed in impartial form namely; time, cost, quality, productivity and waste.…”
Section: Influence Of Materials Management To Project Performancementioning
confidence: 99%