1999
DOI: 10.1177/002215549904700512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Bone Decalcification Procedures on DNA In Situ Hybridization and Comparative Genomic Hybridization: EDTA Is Highly Preferable to a Routinely Used Acid Decalcifier

Abstract: SUMMARYDecalcification is routinely performed for histological studies of bone-containing tissue. Although DNA in situ hybridization (ISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) have been successfully employed on archival material, little has been reported on the use of these techniques on archival decalcified bony material. In this study we compared the effects of two commonly used decalcifiers, i.e., one proprietary, acidbased agent (RDO) and one chelating agent (EDTA), in relation to subsequent DNA ISH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens received acidic pretreatment to decalcify bones, which is known to affect DNA and mRNA integrity. 32 EDTA decalcification, 52 in particular if combined with ultrasonic decalcification, 53 might increase the quality of the DNA extracted. However, the duration of such a decalcification protocol might make it difficult to implement in routine, apart from implementing in specialized centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens received acidic pretreatment to decalcify bones, which is known to affect DNA and mRNA integrity. 32 EDTA decalcification, 52 in particular if combined with ultrasonic decalcification, 53 might increase the quality of the DNA extracted. However, the duration of such a decalcification protocol might make it difficult to implement in routine, apart from implementing in specialized centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the application of EDTA as a decalcifying agent in a routine setting is hampered by the long period required for incubation. 63 New methods such as decalcification in EDTA using a microwave oven and ultrasonic decalcification 64 are reported to considerably reduce the time of decalcification and preserve antigenic sites, DNA and mRNA. 63 In conclusion, overexpression and amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 are confirmed in low-grade osteosarcomas (parosteal osteosarcomas, low-grade central osteosarcomas and dedifferentiated lowgrade osteosarcomas).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 New methods such as decalcification in EDTA using a microwave oven and ultrasonic decalcification 64 are reported to considerably reduce the time of decalcification and preserve antigenic sites, DNA and mRNA. 63 In conclusion, overexpression and amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 are confirmed in low-grade osteosarcomas (parosteal osteosarcomas, low-grade central osteosarcomas and dedifferentiated lowgrade osteosarcomas). The evaluation of MDM2 and CDK4 overexpression by immunohistochemistry appears to be a valuable diagnostic tool to distinguish low-grade osteosarcomas from lookalike benign fibrous and fibro-osseous lesions with quite good sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, together with the difficulty in working with bony samples that contain a mixture of hard and soft tissues 2 has resulted in bone metastases being relatively understudied (compared with prostatic tissue obtained during therapeutic transurethral resection).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%