2017
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Bone Reading CT software on radiologist performance in detecting bone metastases from breast cancer

Abstract: In patients with breast cancer, the use of Bone Reading application improved radiologist performance in bone metastasis detection compared with original chest CT reading with reduced reading time. This software will be more helpful to inexperienced radiologists for improving the reading performance. Advances in knowledge: Small and sclerotic lesions can be easily missed in original CT reading. Using Bone Reading CT software can enhance the performance of radiologists in detecting bone metastasis in breast canc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we found that the two-image set created using the software that automatically flattens the ribs on a single image plane helped novice readers to evaluate the chest CT examinations faster than the standard method. Our findings are in concordance with the ones that Ha et al reported in their paper, in which they evaluated the effect of rib-flattening software on a radiologist's performance [8]. They stated that this specific software helped to improve radiologists' performance, especially for the inexperienced reader.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we found that the two-image set created using the software that automatically flattens the ribs on a single image plane helped novice readers to evaluate the chest CT examinations faster than the standard method. Our findings are in concordance with the ones that Ha et al reported in their paper, in which they evaluated the effect of rib-flattening software on a radiologist's performance [8]. They stated that this specific software helped to improve radiologists' performance, especially for the inexperienced reader.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They demonstrated that the use of a new algorithm for curved planar images providing flattened-rib images eases the evaluation and increases accuracy [7]. Other authors found that unfolded curved planar images may reduce reading times and increase accuracy in the detection of rib lesions in prostate cancer, breast cancer, and multiple myeloma patients [8][9][10]. However, there are some drawbacks to the abovementioned technique: the time required to launch the application distracts the attention of the reader, and a necessity for multiple licenses increases the cost for the radiology department.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Ha et al demonstrated that, in patients with breast cancer, the use of Bone Reading application improved radiologist performance in bone metastasis detection compared with conventional chest CT reading with reduced reading time. 13 Seuss et al reported that in-plane reading of the ribs provides reliable detection of osteoblastic lesions in the screening of prostate cancer patients. 3 In addition, in a study in which the effectiveness of skull unfold application was evaluated in the detection of intracranial hematoma, it was recommended to use the skull opening method in addition to reading transverse sections in routine clinical practice in patients with suspected of traumatic brain injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are in line with findings of the other studies using different bone unfolding softwares. [12][13][14][15][16] On the other hand, in this era contributions of artificial intelligence to the performance of radiologists are extensively investigated and the unfolding software also might be able to be utilized for artificial intelligence interpretation. This is an avenue for future exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%