2016
DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of corneal biomechanical properties on surgically-induced astigmatism and higher-order aberrations after cataract surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, some patients who underwent cataract surgery were included. The effect of cataract surgery on corneal shapes cannot been completely ruled out, [30][31][32] even though these changes are temporary based on several reports. [33][34][35] In conclusion, in GCD eyes, except for a slight increase in the posterior components of GCD2 based on a subtype analysis, none of the components differed from the control, and BCVA was not signi cantly associated with these components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, some patients who underwent cataract surgery were included. The effect of cataract surgery on corneal shapes cannot been completely ruled out, [30][31][32] even though these changes are temporary based on several reports. [33][34][35] In conclusion, in GCD eyes, except for a slight increase in the posterior components of GCD2 based on a subtype analysis, none of the components differed from the control, and BCVA was not signi cantly associated with these components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we observed a significant difference in SIA depending on the proximity of a 2.4-mm corneal incision to the steep axis of preoperative astigmatism. In spite of conflicting data on the extent of SIA in cataract surgery, the incision size has repeatedly been confirmed as the single most important contributing factor: While Kurz et al [20] reported a SIA of 0.31D associated with an incision size of 2.75 mm, others described a SIA of 0.76 D and 0.74 D at 2.8 mm and 2.84 mm incision size, respectively, in a central 6.0mm zone [18,21]. These study groups described SIA irrespective of the incisional relation to the axis of SIA and coupling effect after CPS K original article Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to previous studies [18,20,21], we employed a stricter methodical approach to observe the change in corneal astigmatism by using the measurement of the central 3.00-mm zone, where the corneal astigmatism is clinically more relevant [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koc et al . also was able to demonstrate a significant correlation between CH and spherical aberration in healthy patients after cataract surgery [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%