2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-017-1042-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of doping on optical properties in BiMn1−x (TE) x O3 (where x = 0.0, 0.1 and TE = Cr, Fe, Co, Zn) nanoparticles synthesized by microwave and sol-gel methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For our synthesized pristine STO sample, only one broad peak can be observed at 554 cm −1 , which can be attributed to Ti-O stretching vibration. With an increasing amount of BMO, the peak center gradually shifts to higher wavenumbers and reaches 622 cm −1 for the 0.5STO-0.5BMO According to previous studies, the FT-IR spectrum of phase-pure BMO has two sharp peaks attributed to Mn-O stretching vibrations at 827 and 722 cm −1 [39]. The observed peak shift is the result of the superposition effect of Mn-O and Ti-O bond lengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For our synthesized pristine STO sample, only one broad peak can be observed at 554 cm −1 , which can be attributed to Ti-O stretching vibration. With an increasing amount of BMO, the peak center gradually shifts to higher wavenumbers and reaches 622 cm −1 for the 0.5STO-0.5BMO According to previous studies, the FT-IR spectrum of phase-pure BMO has two sharp peaks attributed to Mn-O stretching vibrations at 827 and 722 cm −1 [39]. The observed peak shift is the result of the superposition effect of Mn-O and Ti-O bond lengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…reported a bandgap of 0.9(5) eV for BiMnO 3 ; however, this value should be interpreted with caution, as in the same investigation, the bandgap of BiFeO 3 was reported as 0.9 eV, when literature's widely accepted value is ∼2.7 eV 19–21 . Bhardwaj et al 22 . prepared BiMnO 3 by sol–gel and reported a bandgap of 1.25 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Based on X-ray emission and absorption spectra, McLeod et al 18 reported a bandgap of 0.9(5) eV for BiMnO 3 ; however, this value should be interpreted with caution, as in the same investigation, the bandgap of BiFeO 3 was reported as 0.9 eV, when literature's widely accepted value is ∼2.7 eV. [19][20][21] Bhardwaj et al 22 prepared BiMnO 3 by solgel and reported a bandgap of 1.25 eV. Xu et al 23 reported a bandgap of 1.1 eV for epitaxial thin films fabricated from BiMnO 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity values of CoNPs and PtNPs were calculated using Eq. ( 6), a quantitative analysis on porosity based on refractive index [37].…”
Section: Tem Anaylsis Of Ptnps and Conpsmentioning
confidence: 99%