2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.hermed.2013.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of extraction conditions on total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of Carica papaya leaf aqueous extracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

27
204
6
13

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
27
204
6
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous study [18] found that extraction yield of P. trimera root gained by water and methanol (11.48% and 11.04% by dry weight, respectively) were significantly higher than those obtained by acetonitrile, ethyl acetate and hexane (2.31%, 2.32% and 2.08% by dry weight, respectively), while the study of Rahman et al [23] demonstrated that phytochemicals and antioxidant potential of C. asiatica were affected by extraction solvent polarity in terms of 100% ethanol, 50% ethanol and water. In comparison with other materials, extraction yield of carrot peel was much higher than that of papaya leaf (19.15% by dry weight), as previously reported by Vuong et al [24], while the study of Chisté et al [25] found that the yield of solid extract from C. villosum fruit pulps obtained the highest level by mix of ethanol and ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v; 46.4% by dry weight), followed by ethyl acetate, water, ethanol and least by 50% ethanol (41.9%, 14.7%, 11.1% and 10.8% by dry weight, respectively). These results indicated that the extraction yield of carrot peel was greatly affected by solvents, of which methanol was the most effective solvent for extraction of solutes from carrot peel.…”
Section: Extraction Yieldsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous study [18] found that extraction yield of P. trimera root gained by water and methanol (11.48% and 11.04% by dry weight, respectively) were significantly higher than those obtained by acetonitrile, ethyl acetate and hexane (2.31%, 2.32% and 2.08% by dry weight, respectively), while the study of Rahman et al [23] demonstrated that phytochemicals and antioxidant potential of C. asiatica were affected by extraction solvent polarity in terms of 100% ethanol, 50% ethanol and water. In comparison with other materials, extraction yield of carrot peel was much higher than that of papaya leaf (19.15% by dry weight), as previously reported by Vuong et al [24], while the study of Chisté et al [25] found that the yield of solid extract from C. villosum fruit pulps obtained the highest level by mix of ethanol and ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v; 46.4% by dry weight), followed by ethyl acetate, water, ethanol and least by 50% ethanol (41.9%, 14.7%, 11.1% and 10.8% by dry weight, respectively). These results indicated that the extraction yield of carrot peel was greatly affected by solvents, of which methanol was the most effective solvent for extraction of solutes from carrot peel.…”
Section: Extraction Yieldsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These data revealed that extraction efficiency of methanol relates to its intermediate polarity that allowed it to solvate low molecular weight organic compounds possessing protonatable functional groups, such as -COOH and -OH [18]. The study of Vuong et al [24] reported that TPC of papaya leaf extracted by various solvents was decreased in order of water, methanol, acetone and ethanol (23.06, 15.03, 10.71 and 9.43 mg GAE/g dry weight, respectively). Previous study of Shahriar et al [29] found that TPC of W. somnifera root was decreased in order by chloroform, petroleum ether, methanol, ethanol and n-hexane (60.99, 56.58, 23.86, 5.46 and 1.43 mg GAE/g dry weight, respectively).…”
Section: Total Phenolic Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Total phenolic content (TPC) was determined using a previously described method [6]. Briefly, 0.5 mL of diluted sample was mixed with 2.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent 10% (v/v) and 2 mL of Na 2 CO 3 7.5% (w/v), then left in the dark at room temperature for 60 min.…”
Section: Total Phenolic Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies indicated that different solvents could lead to different extraction effi ciencies of bioactive compounds (Vuong et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2013). Therefore, this study determined the impact of four different extraction solvents with various polarity indexes to identify the most effective solvent for further optimization using response surface methodology.…”
Section: Phytochemical Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%