2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of feed frame on lubricant sensitivity during upscaling from a compaction simulator to a rotary tablet press

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For lactose and mannitol, the SpecWComp values were similar although lactose was slightly more susceptible to lubricant addition than mannitol. The lower lubricant sensitivity of mannitol is in agreement with previous research (de Backere et al, 2022;Tarlier et al, 2015) and can probably be attributed to its higher SSA (1.09 m 2 /g) compared to lactose (0.13 m 2 /g). The relative area covered by lubricant is smaller for a material with a larger SSA resulting in sufficient lubricant-free surface area available for bonding (Almaya and Aburub, 2008).…”
Section: Tensile Strengthsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For lactose and mannitol, the SpecWComp values were similar although lactose was slightly more susceptible to lubricant addition than mannitol. The lower lubricant sensitivity of mannitol is in agreement with previous research (de Backere et al, 2022;Tarlier et al, 2015) and can probably be attributed to its higher SSA (1.09 m 2 /g) compared to lactose (0.13 m 2 /g). The relative area covered by lubricant is smaller for a material with a larger SSA resulting in sufficient lubricant-free surface area available for bonding (Almaya and Aburub, 2008).…”
Section: Tensile Strengthsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The effect of SA and MgSt on tensile strength, respectively, on lactose and MCC formulations agree with previous studies (de Backere et al, 2022;Paul and Sun, 2018). This can be attributed to the spherical shape of SA which is a less favorable shape towards covering filler particles, hence affecting the tensile strength to a lesser extent.…”
Section: Tensile Strengthsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations