Effect of luting agent on the load to failure and accelerated-fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate laminate veneers

Gresnigt, Marco; Özcan, Mutlu; Carvalho, Marcelo Addas de; Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso; Cune, Marco S.; Razavi, Peywand; Magne, Pascal

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.010

Cited by 56 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The effect of decreased fracture strength of veneers bonded primarily to dentin could be documented by in vitro studies . To further improve the survival rates of extended ceramic veneers, the usage of all‐ceramic materials with improved mechanical properties (eg, lithium‐disilicate ceramic or zirconia‐reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)‐ceramics) may be beneficial . However, to date, clinical data on extended ceramic veneers fabricated from these types of materials are still limited …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When compared with a prospective trial, less strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied . The usage of two different composite cements for luting the veneers without a randomization protocol could also have been a source of bias for the outcomes of this study …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…26,27 To further improve the survival rates of extended ceramic veneers, the usage of all-ceramic materials with improved mechanical properties (eg, lithium-disilicate ceramic or zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)-ceramics) may be beneficial. [28][29][30] However, to date, clinical data on extended ceramic veneers fabricated from these types of materials are still limited. 2 Another possibility to decrease the fracture rate could be to improve bonding protocols.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on the findings of in vitro investigations, the fracture strength of a veneer restoration is influenced by the type of luting agent and the bonding technique. 29,30 In particular, the application of immediate dentin sealing improves adhesion when ceramic veneers are bonded to a large dentin substrate, thereby increasing the fracture strength of veneer restorations. 27 Nevertheless, clinical data on extended veneers with improved bonding protocols are still missing.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…24 The usage of two different composite cements for luting the veneers without a randomization protocol could also have been a source of bias for the outcomes of this study. 26,29,30 Furthermore, all of the restorations were placed by a single operator, which limits potential generalization of the results, as operatorrelated effects on clinical performance could not be evaluated. Considering these limitations, the determined survival and success rates for extended ceramic veneers indicate that they are a reasonable alternative to full crown restorations, even in the anterior mandibular region.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Retrospective evaluation of extended heat‐pressed ceramic veneers after a mean observational period of 7 years

Rinke¹,

Pabel

Schulz

et al. 2018

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Retrospective evaluation of extended heat‐pressed ceramic veneers after a mean observational period of 7 years

Rinke¹,

Pabel

Schulz

et al. 2018

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A 3‐year controlled clinical trial comparing high‐translucency zirconia (cubic zirconia) with lithium disilicate glass ceramic (e.max)

Fawakhiri,

Abboud,

Kanout

2023

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe rate of clinical success in veneers, under esthetics, has achieved a range of 18 months to 20 years. In a plethora of studies, it registers a success rate reaching 75% and even 100%. The most common type of glass ceramics used in ceramics is the vitreous lithium disilicate crystal‐reinforced material, e.max®. Recent studies focus on “polycrystalline ceramic use” in manufacturing veneers, as it possesses a stronger structure and different enabling manufacturing schemes.ObjectivesThis research aims at comparing e.max and the high‐translucent Cubic Zirconia. Such comparison is administered to veneers manufacturing: esthetic (surface and edge, and staining and color matching), functional (crack and fracture, contact point, and patient satisfaction), and biological (posttreatment vitality and hypersensitivity, and periodontal response).Materials and MethodsThe research sample consisted of 60 veneers, divided into two groups: cubic zirconia and e.max. The sample included 2 males (16.6%) and 10 females (83.3%), with age ranging from 25 to 37 years. Patients were thoroughly diagnosed and treated and included in this study based on certain inclusion–exclusion criteria. Hickel's 2010 criteria were utilized to examine and observe the clinical aspect of veneers during intervals of 1 week, 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years.ResultsNo significant differences were traced across the groups for all the variables, with a p‐value being greater than 0.05. The e.max group revealed better clinical results compared to the cubic zirconia one regarding esthetics and tooth translucency. Nonetheless, the results showed a merely slight increase in hypersensitivity in the e.max group.ConclusionWithin the limitation of an extensive follow‐up period, we can conclude that there is no difference between cubic zirconia and e.max (p > 0.05), where e.max and cubic zirconia veneers have the same characteristics in terms of the following. The characteristics of the aspects examined were esthetic, functional, and biological.

show abstract

Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To evaluate the clinical performance of partial glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press) posterior restorations. Materials and methods A total of 765 restorations in 158 patients were placed between 2008 and 2018 and evaluated in a prospective study during regular dental care visits between 2015 and 2018. The restorations were luted with a conventional photo-polymerized resin composite (HFO) in conjunction with an Immediate Dentin Sealing procedure (IDS). Intra-oral photographs and radiographs were made and evaluated using USPHS criteria. Results The mean observation time was 53.3 months (range 3-113 months). Three absolute failures occurred (tooth fractures, n = 2; apical re-infection, n = 1) all leading to the loss of the restored tooth. Repairable and salvageable failures occurred in 9 teeth (endodontic complications, n = 7; secondary caries, n = 1; debonding, n = 1). The survival and success rates according to Kaplan-Meier after 5 years cumulated to 99.6% and 98.6%, respectively. Location (premolar/molar and mandibula/maxilla), prerestorative endodontic status (vital/devitalised) and extension of the indirect ceramic restoration (number of sides and cusps involved) did not significantly affect the cumulative success rate (log rank test, p > 0.05). The condition of the vast majority of the restorations remained unaffected for 5 years. Conclusions Partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations (pressed lithium disilicate (IPS e.max press, Ivoclar Vivadent) luted by means of a conventional photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with the use of an IDS procedure have an excellent medium-term prognosis. Clinical relevance Partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations can be considered as a highly reliable treatment option. Location and extension of the restoration and pre-restorative endodontic status do not affect success rate.

show abstract

Effect of luting agent on the load to failure and accelerated-fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate laminate veneers

Abstract: The delivery of laminate veneers using a direct restorative composite rather than a resin cement resulted in significantly less chipping and fractures, higher fracture strength in both accelerated fatigue and load-to-failure.

Cited by 56 publications

References 30 publications

Retrospective evaluation of extended heat‐pressed ceramic veneers after a mean observational period of 7 years

Retrospective evaluation of extended heat‐pressed ceramic veneers after a mean observational period of 7 years

A 3‐year controlled clinical trial comparing high‐translucency zirconia (cubic zirconia) with lithium disilicate glass ceramic (e.max)

Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About