2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of modified microbial flocculant on membrane fouling alleviation in a hybrid aerobic granular sludge membrane system for wastewater reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HPO aliphatic and aromatic parts of NOM tended to adsorb on the HPO membrane surface . The energy barrier, the maximum value of the total interaction, was expressed as the energy required to overcome the fouling binding to the membrane surface . The energy barrier for direct filtration of raw water was 57.6 mJ/m 2 and increased to 96.5 mJ/m 2 , 158.6 mJ/m 2 , and 193.7 mJ/m 2 with the application of UV/PAA, Fe­(II)/PAA, and Fe­(II)/UV/PAA, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HPO aliphatic and aromatic parts of NOM tended to adsorb on the HPO membrane surface . The energy barrier, the maximum value of the total interaction, was expressed as the energy required to overcome the fouling binding to the membrane surface . The energy barrier for direct filtration of raw water was 57.6 mJ/m 2 and increased to 96.5 mJ/m 2 , 158.6 mJ/m 2 , and 193.7 mJ/m 2 with the application of UV/PAA, Fe­(II)/PAA, and Fe­(II)/UV/PAA, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The energy barrier, the maximum value of the total interaction, was expressed as the energy required to overcome the fouling binding to the membrane surface. 53 The energy barrier for direct filtration of raw water was 57.6 mJ/m 2 and increased to 96.5 mJ/m 2 , 158.6 mJ/m 2 , and 193.7 mJ/m 2 with the application of UV/PAA, Fe(II)/ PAA, and Fe(II)/UV/PAA, respectively. This suggests more energy required for foulants to break the energy barrier to reach the membrane surface.…”
Section: Effect Of Preoxidation On Dominant Fouling Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Membrane fouling decreases membrane permeance, increases cleaning frequency, shortens the lifespan of the membrane, and increases operating costs [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Factors affecting nanofiltration membrane fouling can be generally grouped into three aspects [ 33 , 34 , 35 ]: the feed characteristics such as the pH and ionic conditions; the membrane characteristics such as roughness and hydrophilicity; and the operating conditions such as transmembrane pressure (TMP), temperature, crossflow velocity, and the structure of the membrane module.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%