1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(97)00474-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Mu Opioid Receptor Blockade on Alcohol Intake in Rats Bred for High Alcohol Drinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the acute reinforcing properties of ethanol are in part mediated by the m-opioid receptor as suggested by the common effect of both nalmefene and naltrexone on nondependent ethanol self-administration, as well as the published literature (Hyytia, 1993;Krishnan-Sarin et al, 1998;Stromberg et al, 1998;Koob et al, 2003), then compensatory alterations in the dynorphin system would fit well with the opponent-process theory (Solomon and Corbit, 1974) and contemporary theories of allostasis Roberts et al, 2000;Koob and Le Moal, 2001) when applied to animals in an ethanol-dependent state. Thus, if m-opioid receptor stimulation produces positive hedonic states (Amalric et al, 1987), then one putative compensatory mechanism that could occur would be an increase in the function of dynorphin and/or the k-opioid receptors, stimulation of which produces negative hedonic states (Mucha and Herz, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…If the acute reinforcing properties of ethanol are in part mediated by the m-opioid receptor as suggested by the common effect of both nalmefene and naltrexone on nondependent ethanol self-administration, as well as the published literature (Hyytia, 1993;Krishnan-Sarin et al, 1998;Stromberg et al, 1998;Koob et al, 2003), then compensatory alterations in the dynorphin system would fit well with the opponent-process theory (Solomon and Corbit, 1974) and contemporary theories of allostasis Roberts et al, 2000;Koob and Le Moal, 2001) when applied to animals in an ethanol-dependent state. Thus, if m-opioid receptor stimulation produces positive hedonic states (Amalric et al, 1987), then one putative compensatory mechanism that could occur would be an increase in the function of dynorphin and/or the k-opioid receptors, stimulation of which produces negative hedonic states (Mucha and Herz, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Understanding the contribution of each opioid receptor to EtOH consumption could lead to the development of a more effective therapeutic by permitting more selective targeting of the appropriate receptor(s). For example, MOR selective antagonists reduce EtOH intake (Krishnan-Sarin et al, 1998) while KOR selective antagonists can increase EtOH intake (Mitchell et al, 2005; but see Walker and Koob, 2008) in rats. Therefore, antagonizing all opioid receptors simultaneously is not an optimal treatment strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, administration of opioid agonists (eg morphine) increased alcohol intake in rodents (Czirr et al, 1987;Hubbell et al, 1986;Linseman and Harding, 1990;Nichols et al, 1991;Reid et al, 1986). Antagonists that are selective for the m-ORs (Froehlich et al, 1991;Krishnan-Sarin et al, 1998) or d-ORs also can decrease alcohol drinking (Franck et al, 1998;Froehlich et al, 1991;June et al, 1999;Krishnan-Sarin et al, 1995a, b) (but cf. (Honkanen et al, 1996;Hyytia, 1993;Middaugh et al, 2000;Stromberg et al, 1998;).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%