2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of operating parameters on boron removal from seawater using membrane distillation process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…44 A similar trend was also obtained by most reported studies. 45,46 In fact, the transmembrane water vapor pressure difference can be expressed as: 47 where b w , a w , g w and x w are the membrane DCMD coefficient, membrane activity, membrane activity coefficient and mole fraction of water, respectively. The subscripts w, f and p refer to water, feed and permeate, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Arsenic Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 A similar trend was also obtained by most reported studies. 45,46 In fact, the transmembrane water vapor pressure difference can be expressed as: 47 where b w , a w , g w and x w are the membrane DCMD coefficient, membrane activity, membrane activity coefficient and mole fraction of water, respectively. The subscripts w, f and p refer to water, feed and permeate, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Arsenic Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the salt rejection was higher than 99.9% under each operation temperature. Based on the performance under different temperature, a comparison with the flat-sheet membranes reported in the recent four years was carried out and listed in Table 6 [31,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. It can be found that the PVDF-CTFE membrane prepared in this work presented higher permeate flux in MD desalination application except PES and PSf membranes modified by CF4 plasma.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Flat-sheet MD Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial LEP was 1.8, while the LEP of the membrane after 80 h of operation equals 1.4 bar. This reduction is caused by the reduced surface tension after long term exposure to salts, which is also reported in the literature [51]. However, this reduction is not severe enough to indicate that the coating is washed off during operation.…”
Section: Medium Term Performancementioning
confidence: 56%