2011
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.188946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of orbital bony decompression for Graves' orbitopathy on the volume of extraocular muscles

Abstract: The change in the volume of the MRM may partly explain the variability in the proptosis reduction following orbital decompression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…20 As orbital radiation has been shown to modestly improve extraocular motility impairment, perhaps it can also lessen extraocular muscle swelling after decompression surgery, and as a result, lead to greater proptosis reduction. 15,21 Further studies are needed, as a Type I statistical error with this result is possible given the small sample size and the contradictory reports from literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 As orbital radiation has been shown to modestly improve extraocular motility impairment, perhaps it can also lessen extraocular muscle swelling after decompression surgery, and as a result, lead to greater proptosis reduction. 15,21 Further studies are needed, as a Type I statistical error with this result is possible given the small sample size and the contradictory reports from literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of proptosis reduction has been reported to be associated with the number of walls removed [6], the number and size of cuts made in the periorbita [22], and the type of preoperative proptosis [23]. However, because many complex factors influence the amount of proptosis reduction, it is difficult to predict postoperative outcomes of decompression [11,18,23-25]. To date, thyroid orbital surgeons have developed their own surgical procedures to best predict favorable surgical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Метод имеет как преимущества, так и недо-статки. К преимуществам следует отнести малую инвазивность, внутренний (эндоназальный) подход к орбите, что исключает разрезы кожи и последую-щие рубцовые изменения и обеспечивает выражен-ный регресс экзофтальма до 6 мм [3][4][5][6][7]. К недостат-кам относят высокий процент развития послеопера-ционной диплопии и косоглазия, которые встреча-ются с частотой до 40% случаев [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: обоснованиеunclassified