2008
DOI: 10.1556/ageod.43.2008.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of positional inaccuracies on multielectrode results

Abstract: This paper investigates the effect of electrode positioning errors on the inverted pseudosection. Instead of random spacing errors (as usually assumed in geoelectrics) we exactly measured this effect among field conditions. In the field, in spite of the greatest possible care, the electrode positions contain some inaccuracy: either in case of dense undergrowth, or varied topography, or very rocky field. In all these cases, it is not possible to put the electrodes in their theoretical position. As a consequence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that the greater the offline electrode distance the more the effect. This outcome is contrary to that of Szalai et al (2008), who found that offline electrodes effect on 2-D ERT result was insignificant. More so, the low resistivity zone or saturated zone along the distance (12 m -27 m) at a depth of 4 m and beyond (Figure 8a), decrease to 13 m -24 m for WA-2EO survey at 1.2 m offline electrodes distance (Figure 8g).…”
Section: Wenner Array With Two Electrodes Offline (Wa-2eo)contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shows that the greater the offline electrode distance the more the effect. This outcome is contrary to that of Szalai et al (2008), who found that offline electrodes effect on 2-D ERT result was insignificant. More so, the low resistivity zone or saturated zone along the distance (12 m -27 m) at a depth of 4 m and beyond (Figure 8a), decrease to 13 m -24 m for WA-2EO survey at 1.2 m offline electrodes distance (Figure 8g).…”
Section: Wenner Array With Two Electrodes Offline (Wa-2eo)contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…But, due to surface constraint associated with most survey areas, it is rarely possible to conduct a two-dimensional resistivity survey on a straight line. To this end, Szalai et al (2008) investigated the effect of electrode positioning error on the inverted pseudo-section of a 2-D ERT survey. They found the positioning error to be insignificant except for a very rocky field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is well known that inaccurate electrode positions lead to severe artifacts in the inverted resistivity models [ Zhou and Dahlin , ; Oldenborger et al ., ; Szalai et al ., ; Wilkinson et al ., , , ], conventional time‐lapse inversion methodologies, such as difference, ratio, or 4‐D inversion [e.g., LaBrecque and Yang , ; Daily et al ., ; Kim et al ., ], have not previously allowed for changing electrode positions with time. Thus, a new methodology has been developed to incorporate electrode movements into a time‐lapse inversion workflow (Figure ).…”
Section: Geoelectrical Monitoring Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When landslides move, the electrode positions vary with time. Several studies have shown that misplaced electrodes cause significant distortions in the resistivity models [ Zhou and Dahlin , ; Oldenborger et al ., ; Szalai et al ., ; Wilkinson et al ., , , , ; Uhlemann et al ., ]. At the studied landslide, Uhlemann et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…errors, originating from a possible incorrect positioning of electrodes), and the effect of these errors on various multielectrode arrays (Szalai et al 2007(Szalai et al , 2008a.…”
Section: Studying Of Errors Due To Incorrect Positioning Of Electrodementioning
confidence: 99%