2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of process parameters for selective laser melting with SUS316L on mechanical and microstructural properties with variation in chemical composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase of grain size with decreasing cooling rates was already reported by Zitelli et al [1] and Keshavarzkermani et al [14]. Interestingly, Bang et al [58] recently investigated changes in microstructure and hardness i.a. of small 10 mm cubic L-PBF specimens of 316L over a broad range of parameter combinations of laser power (80 W to 480 W) and scanning velocity (493 mm•s −1 to 2958 mm•s −1 ).…”
Section: Subsumption Of the Results With Regard To Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An increase of grain size with decreasing cooling rates was already reported by Zitelli et al [1] and Keshavarzkermani et al [14]. Interestingly, Bang et al [58] recently investigated changes in microstructure and hardness i.a. of small 10 mm cubic L-PBF specimens of 316L over a broad range of parameter combinations of laser power (80 W to 480 W) and scanning velocity (493 mm•s −1 to 2958 mm•s −1 ).…”
Section: Subsumption Of the Results With Regard To Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…As mentioned elsewhere, a direct comparison of VED values is not acceptable in its entirety and has to be done very carefully, see, e.g., [59,60]. However, when considering a comparison of the hardness values of Bang et al [58] with the values of the present study-its pre-study [5]-it becomes clear that Bang et al [58] used a much broader range of processing parameters (laser power and scanning velocity) than in the present study. Thereby, they provoked similar conditions in terms of resulting hardness and trends of increasing microstructural feature size at their 10 mm cubic specimens.…”
Section: Subsumption Of the Results With Regard To Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CO 2 –SLM samples, the scan speed was slower than in the fiber laser one, and this implied higher energy input values and higher temperatures. Therefore, as there was more heat to evacuate, cooling was slower, and it favored the formation of delta ferrite [ 53 ] and grain growth [ 54 , 55 ]. The CO 2 –SLM samples showed greater porosity than other samples, which also resulted in a lower hardness value because of the reduced effective density of the material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many researchers have made extensive studies on the microstructure and mechanical properties of SLM stainless steel materials around process parameters, such as laser power, scanning speed, and powder feeding rate. For example, optimizing the laser energy density can enhance the intensity of SUS316L material [11], and choosing a reasonable scanning speed can improve the surface quality and increase the hardness of 316L material [12]. Furthermore, the forming angle and scanning strategy also significantly affect the microstructure and tensile strength of SLM316L material [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%