Effect of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Participation of People with Limited Upper Limb Functioning: A Systematic Review with GRADE Recommendations

Abstract

Background. Previous studies have suggested that robot-assisted therapy (RT) is effective in treating impairment and that it may also improve individuals’ participation. Objective. To investigate the effect of RT on the participation of individuals with limited upper limb functioning (PROSPERO: CRD42019133880). Data Sources: PEDro, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, AMED, and Compendex. Inclusion Criteria. We selected randomized or quasirandomized controlled studies comparing the effects of RT with minimal or other interventions on participation of individuals with limited upper limb functioning. Data Extraction and Synthesis. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the 0-10 PEDro scale, and effect estimates were reported using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the certainty of the current evidence was assessed using the GRADE. Results. Twelve randomized controlled studies involving 845 participants were included. The estimates of medium effects between RT and minimal intervention (MI) at a short-term follow-up were pooled, but there are no short-term effects between RT and OI. Standardized differences in means were as follows: 0.6 (95% CI 0.1 to 1.2) and 0.2 (95% CI -0.0 to 0.4). There were also no effects of additional RT in the short- or medium-term follow-up periods. Standardized differences in means were as follows: -0.6 (95% CI -1.1 to -0.1) and 0.2 (95% CI -0.3 to 0.8). The methodological quality of the included studies potentially compromised the effect estimates of RT. The existing evidence was very low-quality with many confounding variables between studies. Conclusions. For patients with upper limb neurological dysfunction, low-quality evidence supports RT over MI in terms of improving individual participation in the short term. The existing low- to very low-quality evidence does not support RT over OI in either the short- or medium-term follow-up periods with respect to community participation.

Innovative Technologies in the Neurorehabilitation of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review

“…In the same way, devices for upper limb rehabilitation have been developed to guarantee the intensity and repeatability of shoulder, arm and hand movements [ 8 ], although the reproducibility of the upper limb kinematics is more complex. In particular, no single device has proven feasible and effective in rehabilitating all movements of the upper limb joints.…”

Development of portable robotic orthosis and biomechanical validation in people with limited upper limb function after stroke

“…This characteristic extends the use of the device to individuals who have difficulty in locomotion and are unable to go to the predefined locations for rehabilitation. Authors [24,25] state the importance of embedding the drive system and enabling portability. When rehabilitation occurs in favorable physical and social environments, there is an optimization of participation and social inclusion of individuals with physical disabilities.…”