2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of soil variability on nonlinear site response predictions: Application to the Lotung site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shear wave velocity accounts for the stiffness properties of the soil layers and is an important and influential input parameter for site amplification analyses [24][25][26]. Standard penetration test blow count (SPT N-value) as derived from in situ testing of soil samples is the common metrics for characterizing the stiffness properties of the soil.…”
Section: Shear Wave Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shear wave velocity accounts for the stiffness properties of the soil layers and is an important and influential input parameter for site amplification analyses [24][25][26]. Standard penetration test blow count (SPT N-value) as derived from in situ testing of soil samples is the common metrics for characterizing the stiffness properties of the soil.…”
Section: Shear Wave Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By capturing the linear elastic response of the Turkey Flat site, they demonstrated the significant contribution of small-strain soil properties to site response variability. Additional work has been published specifically examining the effects of soil parameter uncertainty on ground response variability (Andrade and Borja, 2006; Barani et al, 2013; Bazzurro and Cornell, 2004; Boaga et al, 2011; Falcone et al, 2020; Guzel et al, 2020; Li, 2014; Nour et al, 2003; Sun et al, 2020; Ulmer et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the standard, a PGA value of 0.19g has been stipulated to Chittagong city. There are several site response studies reported in the literature for different regions across the globe to estimate surface level seismic hazard and the application of site response analysis are popular in recent studies as well due to its critical importance (Derras et al, 2020;Régnier et al, 2020;Adampira and Derakhshandi, 2020;Pavel et al, 2020;Guzel et al, 2020;Kakhki et al, 2020). However, it can be observed that there is a lack of implementation of the site-speci c soil data in the evaluation of ground motion parameters in the Chittagong region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%