1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02360580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sprout inhibitors on potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.) stored at ambient or reduced temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the findings of earlier workers using CIPC dust (1% a.i.) under storage temperatures of 6°C, 10°C and 25°C (Wessel and Wustman 1990) and under non-refrigerated conditions with temperatures of 16-30°C (Mehta and Kaul 1991;Singh et al 2004). Effective sprout inhibition was observed at both application rates of 20 and 30 mg a.i.kg −1 tubers (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the findings of earlier workers using CIPC dust (1% a.i.) under storage temperatures of 6°C, 10°C and 25°C (Wessel and Wustman 1990) and under non-refrigerated conditions with temperatures of 16-30°C (Mehta and Kaul 1991;Singh et al 2004). Effective sprout inhibition was observed at both application rates of 20 and 30 mg a.i.kg −1 tubers (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, a major problem of the potato crisp industry is the lack of a continuous supply of tubers with low reducing sugar concentration to ensure the desired light crisp colour (Kadam et al 1991). There are few reports in the literature on the efficacy of these inhibitors under non-refrigerated storage systems (Mehta and Kaul 1991). Double treatment with CIPC dust proved effective in extending the storage life of potatoes under traditional storage methods like heaps and pits for up to 16 weeks, by reducing weight loss due to respiration and evaporation, sprouting and sprout growth in tubers (Mehta and Ezekiel 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemicals treatments, low temperature storage and ionizing irradiations are considered as an alternative method to inhibit sprouting. Chemicals such as maleic hydrazide (MH), isopropyl-N-3chlorophenylcarbamate (CIPC), isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamate (IPC) and tetrachloro nitrobenzene (TCNB) are used as effective sprout inhibitors but at the same time with a negative impact on the quality of tubers where its use would lead to prevent the development of wound periderm in potato tubers which cause an increase in microbial rots in storage (Mehta and Kaul, 1991) and induces an increase in reducing sugar causing darker fry color (Gichohi and Pritchard, 1995). Moreover, the residues of this chemical is a vital concern about the safety of food because its carcinogenic effects on consumers (Burton, 1992;Walsh,1995).…”
Section: Introduction: -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potato weight loss is primarily caused by tuber transpiration and respiration during storage. Transpiration contributes to more than 90% of total weight loss, and is mostly caused by diffusion of water vapor from the tuber skin to the surrounding air due to the difference in water vapor pressure within the cells of the tuber skin and the air, called water vapor pressure deficit [31,32]. The higher the ambient air temperature, the more water loss from the tuber.…”
Section: Warmer Wound-healing Temperature Resulted In Less Weight Losmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor that can cause potato weight loss is sprout growth during storage [32]. Burton [40] estimated that respiration of potatoes increases by 50% if sprouts reach 1% of tuber weight.…”
Section: Warmer Wound-healing Temperature Resulted In Less Weight Losmentioning
confidence: 99%