2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of streambed bacteria release on E. coli concentrations: Monitoring and modeling with the modified SWAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
100
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the top sensitive parameters were related with channel or overland routing. This result is in agreement with previous calibration works, showing that CN2, ALPHA_BF, and SLSUBBSN were highly ranked in the sensitivity analysis [38][39][40]. Table 2 shows the ANN-associated parameters including learning rate, momentum constant, and number of neurons optimized by the pattern search method and SOM-related errors: quantization and topographic errors.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Most of the top sensitive parameters were related with channel or overland routing. This result is in agreement with previous calibration works, showing that CN2, ALPHA_BF, and SLSUBBSN were highly ranked in the sensitivity analysis [38][39][40]. Table 2 shows the ANN-associated parameters including learning rate, momentum constant, and number of neurons optimized by the pattern search method and SOM-related errors: quantization and topographic errors.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The model sensitivity tests indicate that the releasing (or desorption) and decay processes of E. coli from the top sediment layer (<2mm) of the land surface in rural catchments plays an important role in [77,78] and MIKE for an integrated FIO modelling system [52], predictions made using the model developed in the current study have a similar or even higher level of accuracy. The basic value of the calculated level of E. coli production, which is primarily formed by FIO inputs released from the rural catchments, is properly calculated in the current model.…”
Section: Key Processes Methods and Model Performancementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Because it is very convenient to access the source code of SWAT, great efforts to develop this model have been made by a number of researchers (e.g. Eckhardt and Ulbrich 2003, Kim et al 2010, Kemanian et al 2011. We also added code into the source file (grow.f) of SWAT2005 to output information on primary growth stress of every hydrological response unit (HRU) from February to November on a daily basis.…”
Section: The Swat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%