Effect of Substrate Concentration on Soil Enzyme Urease

Kumari, J. Aruna; Rao, P. C.; Padmaja, G.; Madhavi, M.

doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.903.134

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Improvement in urease enzyme activity is highly dependent on the availability of substrates like urea or ammonium-based fertilizers for nitrogen-cycling enzymes, which results in increased enzyme activity as a positive association has been reported between the substrate and urease activity ( Ibrahim et al., 2020 ). Meanwhile, when the N input increased from N2 to N3, the urease enzyme activity did not increase significantly, which may be due to the absorption of mineral N by soil microorganisms or buildup of NH +4 that suppressed the urease activity ( Kumari et al., 2020 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mixed legume–grass seeding and nitrogen fertilizer input enhance forage yield and nutritional quality by improving the soil enzyme activities in Sichuan, China

Muhammad

Xiao

et al. 2023

Front. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Information regarding relationships between forage yield and soil enzymes of legume–grass mixtures under nitrogen (N) fertilization can guide the decision-making during sustainable forage production. The objective was to evaluate the responses of forage yield, nutritional quality, soil nutrients, and soil enzyme activities of different cropping systems under various N inputs. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), white clover (Trifolium repens L.), orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) were grown in monocultures and mixtures (A1: alfalfa, orchardgrass, and tall fescue; A2: alfalfa, white clover, orchardgrass, and tall fescue) under three N inputs (N1: 150 kg ha−1; N2, 300 kg ha−1; and N3: 450 kg ha−1) in a split plot arrangement. The results highlight that A1 mixture under N2 input had a greater forage yield of 13.88 t ha−1 year−1 than the other N inputs, whereas A2 mixture under N3 input had a greater forage of 14.39 t ha−1 year−1 than N1 input, but it was not substantially greater than N2 input (13.80 t ha−1 year−1). The crude protein (CP) content of grass monocultures and mixtures significantly (P < 0.05) increased with an increase in the rate of N input, and A1 and A2 mixtures under N3 input had a greater CP content of 18.91% and 18.94% dry matter, respectively, than those of grass monocultures under various N inputs. The A1 mixture under N2 and N3 inputs had a substantially greater (P < 0.05) ammonium N content of 16.01 and 16.75 mg kg−1, respectively, whereas A2 mixture under N3 had a greater nitrate N content of 4.20 mg kg−1 than the other cropping systems under various N inputs. The A1 and A2 mixtures under N2 input had a substantial higher (P < 0.05) urease enzyme activity of 0.39 and 0.39 mg g−1 24 h−1 and hydroxylamine oxidoreductase enzyme activity of 0.45 and 0.46 mg g−1 5 h−1, respectively, than the other cropping systems under various N inputs. Taken together, growing legume–grass mixtures under N2 input is cost-effective, sustainable, and eco-friendly, which provide greater forage yield and improved nutritional quality by the better utilization of resources.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%