1994
DOI: 10.5006/1.3293478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Superficial Oxides on Corrosion of Steel Reinforcement Embedded in Concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This oxide/hydroxide layer, although electrochemically active, will not have the properties of the initially formed passive layer and cannot be considered as such. This must be the case as a growth of this deposit layer is not influencing the barrier (passive) layer i.e., the deposit layer, which becomes thicker with cycling, will not contribute to passivity, since a contribution to passivity would result in a delay of film growth [78]. This would mean that the layer formation at peak III for group R and the protected groups P is mainly relevant to oxidation of Fe 2R to Fe 3R instead of the formation from metallic iron.…”
Section: Region I -Hydrogen Evolution Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This oxide/hydroxide layer, although electrochemically active, will not have the properties of the initially formed passive layer and cannot be considered as such. This must be the case as a growth of this deposit layer is not influencing the barrier (passive) layer i.e., the deposit layer, which becomes thicker with cycling, will not contribute to passivity, since a contribution to passivity would result in a delay of film growth [78]. This would mean that the layer formation at peak III for group R and the protected groups P is mainly relevant to oxidation of Fe 2R to Fe 3R instead of the formation from metallic iron.…”
Section: Region I -Hydrogen Evolution Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, after the first cycle there is initial drop in the anodic current at peak IIIa, which is probably associated with an attempt to repair the initially formed product layer and repassivation in the high alkaline medium of pH 12.6. Rust layers however (as in specimen C) in alkaline solutions, even without the presence of Cl À , may produce active corrosion on the steel surface [78][79][80]. Thus competing mechanisms of passivation and de-passivation are most likely responsible for the almost constantly high currents at anodic and cathodic peaks III and V in specimen C with cycling, since the rust interferes in some way with the passivation process.…”
Section: Region I -Hydrogen Evolution Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detrimental effect of corrosion on the service life of reinforced concrete structures induced the development of various research projects in different domains 7–17 including the description of electrochemical processes in reinforcing steel/concrete system, favourable corrosion conditions, transport mechanisms and kinetics of aggressive species, mechanical consequences, monitoring tools… Nevertheless, very few studies were dedicated to local analytical characterisations of the steel/concrete interface in these chlorinated environments, in relation with the electrochemical behaviour. This knowledge is of primary importance in view of mechanical modelling as each corrosion product presents different volume that will affect the expansion of the rebar/concrete interface during the corrosion process 18, 19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novak et al (2001) reported that pre-rusted steel bars in concrete, even without any chloride content, shows technically unacceptable average corrosion rate. Mendoza et al (1994) also found a very high corrosion rate for the rusted steel bars. On the other hand, AlTayyib et al (1990) reported that the initial rusting does not have an adverse effect on the corrosion resistance of rebar embedded in concrete, which contradicts with the results obtained by Mendoza et al (1994) Novak et al (2001) and Li and Sagues (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Mendoza et al (1994) also found a very high corrosion rate for the rusted steel bars. On the other hand, AlTayyib et al (1990) reported that the initial rusting does not have an adverse effect on the corrosion resistance of rebar embedded in concrete, which contradicts with the results obtained by Mendoza et al (1994) Novak et al (2001) and Li and Sagues (2001). Also, based on the accelerated laboratory investigations and long-term exposure tests in the marine environment, it was found that micro-structure of steel-concrete interface (physical adhesion, voids, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%