1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf02644649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface conditions on the normal spectral emittance of titanium and zirconium between 1000 and 1800 K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the spectral emissivity of solids is also very sensitive to the surface condition of the sample, i.e., the roughness of the sample surface. [5,6] This effect is considered to be a source of scatter in published data for solid metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the spectral emissivity of solids is also very sensitive to the surface condition of the sample, i.e., the roughness of the sample surface. [5,6] This effect is considered to be a source of scatter in published data for solid metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments of Baria and Bautista [23] validated the effect of the surface roughness on the absorptivity 4 at higher temperatures with the result of a more intense absorption peak at specific temperatures at higher surface roughness. Wieting and DeRosa [24] measured a 30% higher absorptivity of a CO 2 laser beam on ground than on polished surfaces at room temperature, while this difference disappeared at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Due to its wide application in industry, metal sheets of AISI 304 (X5CrNi18-10) stainless steel with different surface finishes were used for the determination of the absorptivity behaviour. [13] 0.05-3.26 0.08-4.17 1.053; 0.527 Ang et al [14] 0-5 0.248 Peiponen and Tsuboi [15] 0.1-1.6 0.632; 0.488 Barbarino et al [16] 0.002-0.7 Halogen lamp Endriz and Spicer [17] 0.001-0.027 0-0.4 Beaglehole and Hunderi [18] 0.002-0.005 0.05 0.25; 0.55 Elson and Sung [19] 0.003-0.06 1-5 1; 4; 10 Bergström et al [20] 0.01-2 1.064 Zhang et al [21] 0.05 0.5-1 Wang et al [22] no details about roughness heights 0.445 Baria and Bautista [23] electropolished, mechanically polished, ground K60 0.645…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations