2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface modification on starch biopolymer wettability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, another substance added to starch matrix such as oil, proteins or chitosan, caused a rise of the surface hydrophobicity. Results are in good agreement with literature: Heydari et al , Jiménez et al , and Wiącek showed the effect of pure starch films on contact angles changes according the incorporation of hydrophobic or hydrophilic substances. The contact angle is directly related to the ratio of the both biopolymers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Usually, another substance added to starch matrix such as oil, proteins or chitosan, caused a rise of the surface hydrophobicity. Results are in good agreement with literature: Heydari et al , Jiménez et al , and Wiącek showed the effect of pure starch films on contact angles changes according the incorporation of hydrophobic or hydrophilic substances. The contact angle is directly related to the ratio of the both biopolymers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The high wettability (minor contact angle) of achira starch films with lactic acid (L-9) in the presence of both sorbitol and glycerol indicated that the starch matrix in these films had a greater number of sites available for hydrogen bonding with water molecules due to less interaction between hydroxyl groups of starch and plasticizing hydroxyl or amide groups (polar components) during film preparation, behavior similar to that reported for babassu starch films [51]. In general, the contact angle values decreased as the concentration of lactic acid increased, and these results can be associated with the fact that this acid reached a better gelatinization process when the hydrophobic and polar components are oriented to surface of the gel [52]; the steric hindrance is the key to orient the most polar components of the branched-chain of amylopectin. In blends of starch with lactic acid, it is possible that the steric phenome is more abundant than in blends of starch with oleic acid.…”
Section: Contact Angle Analysissupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The positive effect of reducing the surface tension contributes to reducing significantly the cohesive forces (F = 115.64 ± 0.73 mN m −1 and FE = 104.12 ± 0.93 mN m −1 ), thus improving the compatibility between the solution and the fruits' skin surface. This phenomenon may be attributed to the reorientation of polar groups in the surface layer, which increases the hydrophobicity of the solution (Wiacek, 2015). In this regard, Foschia, Peressini, Sensidoni, and Brennan (2013) explained that the hydroxyl groups of antioxidant compounds, such as gallic acid, improve the wettability of coatings.…”
Section: Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%