2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion on Upper Airway Volume: A Systematic Review

Abstract: SARME was found to produce substantial short-term volume increases in the nasal cavity in non-growing patients that were maintained for at least 63 months. Evidence weakly suggested no effect on oropharyngeal volume. However, most studies were evaluated as having a high risk of bias. The effect of such volume changes on respiratory function still needs to be determined; thus, SARME cannot be recommended for respiratory purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(151 reference statements)
1
15
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have reported an increase of the nasal cavity volume and poor effect on oropharyngeal volume after SARME. 3,12 Nevertheless, patients tend to be reluctant to undergo surgical procedures due to trauma. Recently, mini-implant assisted rapid maxillary expansion (MARME) for mature patients has been demonstrated to provide similar skeletal expansion to SARME, reducing surgical injury and adverse dentoalveolar side effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported an increase of the nasal cavity volume and poor effect on oropharyngeal volume after SARME. 3,12 Nevertheless, patients tend to be reluctant to undergo surgical procedures due to trauma. Recently, mini-implant assisted rapid maxillary expansion (MARME) for mature patients has been demonstrated to provide similar skeletal expansion to SARME, reducing surgical injury and adverse dentoalveolar side effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(BELL & EPKER, 1976;BELL & JACOBS, 1979;GLASSMAN et al 1984;LEHMAN, HASS & HASS, 1984;SCHWARZ et al 1985;BAYS & GRECO, 1992;BETTS et al 1995;BASDRA, ZOLLER & KOMPOSH, 1995;LAUDEMANN et al 2009 Outros autores consideram que o sucesso obtido com técnicas mais conservadoras traz um perfil de risco e benefício que deve ser considerado (GLASSMAN et al, 1974;SEEBERGER et al, 2010). A ampla variabilidade dos resultados pode ser associada a grande variedade de técnicas e protocolos utilizados, bem como a escassez de estudos randomizados, com método e protocolos de avaliação padronizados (BUCK et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…25 Iwasaki et al observed that RME not only reduced the nasal obstruction, but also raised the tongue and enlarged the pharyngeal airway volume. 26 Buck et al presented a systematic review on the effects of surgically-assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) on the upper air-way volume and concluded that the effects of SARME on the respiratory function still needed to be evaluated, 27 and that was the aim of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%