2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of swing phase load on metal-on-metal hip lubrication, friction and wear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
50
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
50
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Acute dislocation and joint laxity with subluxations and microseparations can induce local and systemic release of chromium and cobalt particles (Williams et al 2006, Brown et al 2007). Simulator studies have shown that there is a substantial release of particles when microseparation is introduced into the gait cycle (Williams et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute dislocation and joint laxity with subluxations and microseparations can induce local and systemic release of chromium and cobalt particles (Williams et al 2006, Brown et al 2007). Simulator studies have shown that there is a substantial release of particles when microseparation is introduced into the gait cycle (Williams et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friction measurements were performed with swing phase loads of 25, 100, and 300 N. A previous study 39 including theoretical analysis has predicted a reduced fluid film thickness with increasing swing phase load, which may be associated with less effective entrainment of fluid during the swing phase of the gait cycle. Studies with MoM implants demonstrated increases in both friction and wear with increase in swing phase load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These moments are not only determined by the patient’s activities and, thus, the frequency and magnitude of the contact forces but also by the amount of friction in the joint. In vitro studies using different test conditions [718] demonstrated that the materials of the implant head and inlay primarily influenced the friction. In several studies, the stability of cup-bone bonding was investigated in cadavers or using plastic bone substitutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%