2017
DOI: 10.5958/2349-4433.2017.00014.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Variety and Method of Sowing Adopted by Farmers on Wheat Yield in District Kapurthala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But both net return and Benefit cost ratio was higher in happy seeder sowing from conventional sowing method (Table 2). The result also confirmed the findings of earlier workers [13][14][15] where grain yield is slightly higher with conventional method as compared to happy seeder sowing method but produced lower net return and Benefit cost ratio from happy seeder. Wheat sowing with happy seeder reduced the number of operations (2 disc harrow, 2 cultivator and 2 planker operations) resulting in reduction of the cost of cultivation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But both net return and Benefit cost ratio was higher in happy seeder sowing from conventional sowing method (Table 2). The result also confirmed the findings of earlier workers [13][14][15] where grain yield is slightly higher with conventional method as compared to happy seeder sowing method but produced lower net return and Benefit cost ratio from happy seeder. Wheat sowing with happy seeder reduced the number of operations (2 disc harrow, 2 cultivator and 2 planker operations) resulting in reduction of the cost of cultivation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…22325/ha) from Rs 28641.6/ha under conventional sowing method ( Table 2). The result also confirms the findings of 13,15] where grain yield is slight higher with conventional method as compared to happy seeder sowing method but produced higher net return and Benefit cost ratio.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%