2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness evaluation of objective and subjective weighting methods for aquifer vulnerability assessment in urban context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, when evaluating the comprehensive grade of all courses for each student in a class, the information provided by the series of the original course scores was effective, and the series should be used to calculate the corresponding entropy value and the weight of each course. Nevertheless, when The previous studies [22][23][24][25][26]28,38] mostly used the original index value to calculate the corresponding entropy value when applying the entropy weight method. However, it is not reasonable to always utilize the information provided by the original index for different study objects.…”
Section: Weight Of Each Decision-making Index In the Respective Subsymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, when evaluating the comprehensive grade of all courses for each student in a class, the information provided by the series of the original course scores was effective, and the series should be used to calculate the corresponding entropy value and the weight of each course. Nevertheless, when The previous studies [22][23][24][25][26]28,38] mostly used the original index value to calculate the corresponding entropy value when applying the entropy weight method. However, it is not reasonable to always utilize the information provided by the original index for different study objects.…”
Section: Weight Of Each Decision-making Index In the Respective Subsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in index weight for the two seasons may be caused by the difference in the distance of grey relation coefficients between every two schemes. Moreover, the combined weights of sixteen indices were calculated (Table 8) according to Equation (24), and the corresponding minimum values of objective function F in Equation (23) were 0.596 and 1.425 during the 2015 and 2016 seasons, respectively.…”
Section: Cropping Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scientific basis viz-a-viz the theory and the established algorithm for the DIM technically adapt the weight linear combination (WLC) mathematically, where the weight, the range and the rating of imputes are often expressed numerically. The information on the model working principle has been documented in several studies of Sahoo et al (2016), Mogaji (2017) and Aller et al (1987). According to Ettazarini and El Mahmouhi (2004), the hydrogeological parameters component for the workability of the model includes: depth to water table (D), net recharge (R), aquifer media (A), soil media (S), topography or slope (T), impact of the vadose zone (I) and hydraulic conductivity (C).…”
Section: Drastic Index Model (Dim) Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach might take full advantage of learned knowledge, but the use of different experts could lead to different assessment results. The objective weight methods include principal component analysis [29,30], the entropy weight method [31,32], and the variation coefficient method [33,34]. These methods are mainly based on real data rather than expert judgments, taking advantage of the objectivity of real data, but the utilized data may not conform precisely to the actual situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%