Effectiveness of a Risk-Based Visitor-Prioritizing System at a Sexually Transmitted Infection Outpatient Clinic

Abstract

Effectiveness of a risk-based visitor-prioritizing system at a sexually transmitted infection outpatient clinic Heijman, T.L.J.; van der Bij, A.; de Vries, H.J.C.; van Leent, E.J.M.; Thiesbrummel, H.F.J.; Fennema, H.S.A. General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. Objective: The objective of this study was to study the efficacy/ effectiveness of a risk-based visitor-prioritizing system at a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic aimed to improve screening capacity by providing tailored service.Study Design: In April 2004, a prioritizing system was implemented that classifies visitors as high or low risk depending on reported sexual behavior and previous STI events. The high-and low-risk groups are assigned to standard and short screening protocols, respectively. Both protocols include diagnostic testing for syphilis, urogenital gonorrhea, chlamydia, and optional for HIV. To assess the effectiveness of the system, differences in prevalence of STI diagnoses in the standard and short protocol were analyzed by 2 test. Results: In total, 14,391 visitors (64%) received standard screening and 8,056 visitors (36%) received short screening. The STI prevalence in both groups was 18.1% and 7.6%, respectively (P <0.001); prevalence of HIV was 1.8% and 0.3%, respectively (P <0.001). The sensitivity of the prioritizing system was 74%. Specificity was substantially lower (42%).Conclusions: This prioritizing system is effective in differentiating between visitors at high and low risk for STI, contributing to provision of tailored STI service, increasing efficiency, and client access to STI service.

Effect of HIV and Chlamydia Infection on Rectal Inflammation and Cytokine Concentrations in Men Who Have Sex with Men

“…All patients were screened for STIs according to the clinic protocol (19). A nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) (Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay; Gen-Probe Incorporated, San Diego, CA) was used to diagnose C. trachomatis infection.…”

Clonally Related Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates with Decreased Susceptibility to the Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin Cefotaxime in Amsterdam, the Netherlands

“…Clients can visit the STI clinic anonymously, free of charge, and without referral of a health care provider. Upon arrival, clients are prioritized based on a short questionnaire to estimate the risk for having an STI (11). All clients who are considered high-risk patients get a full STI checkup, including collection of swabs for N. gonorrhoeae cultivation and a detailed questionnaire concerning risk behavior.…”

Symptomatic primary HIV infection in a 49-year-old man who has sex with men: beware of the window phase

“…The patient was routinely screened for syphilis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, HIV and hepatitis B, according to the standard protocol described before [1]. Awaiting definite results of syphilis serology (Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay, TPPA), secondary stage syphilis was excluded with a directly performed Rapid Plasma Reagin card test (RPR nosticon II, bioMerieux, France).…”