Effectiveness of a screening tool to assess prevention and rehabilitation needs of 45 to 59 years old in primary care – study protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PReHa45)

Abstract

Background: For years it has been stated that the need for prevention and rehabilitation is not always identified early enough. Although many individuals have regular contact with a general practitioner (GP), this access path for applying for a prevention or rehabilitation service has not been fully exploited. The important role of GPs in supporting the intention to apply is highlighted in the research. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the “check-up 45+” to support GPs both in identifying the need for prevention and rehabilitation services and in submitting applications. Methods: The study is designed as a two-arm, pragmatic 1:1 randomised controlled study (RCT), which will be conducted in about 20 general practices in the German states of Berlin and Brandenburg. Patients (n=1,654) aged from 45 to 59 years will be recruited by medical assistants. In addition to usual care, both study groups will receive a questionnaire covering socio-economic and occupational variables to be filled out immediately in the waiting room. The intervention group passes through the “check-up 45+”. This includes the completion of the “screening 45+” that aims to assess the need for prevention and rehabilitation services. Medical assistants will immediately evaluate this 2-page screening tool. If a need is identified and confirmed by the GP, information and application documents will be handed over. Moreover, the application process for rehabilitation services is simplified. Primary outcome is the proportion of applications for prevention or rehabilitation services financed by the German Pension Insurance. Administrative data will be provided for this purpose. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of approved applications and completed services. In addition, the proportion of persons with a need for prevention or rehabilitation according to the “check-up 45+” will be examined. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted and content-analysed to determine the practicability and acceptance of the “check-up 45+” by the relevant stakeholders. Discussion: Prevention and rehabilitation need is insufficiently identified and addressed so far. This study will determine the effectiveness and of the “check-up 45+” in primary care. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028303, 03.03.2022).