Effectiveness of cochlear implants in children: Long term results

Peixoto, Maria Conceição; Spratley, Jorge; Oliveira, Guiomar; Martins, Jorge Humberto; Bastos, José Roberto Magalhães; Ribeiro, Carlos

doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.12.005

Cited by 43 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Dauguma tarptautiniuose mokslo leidiniuose publikuojamų straipsnių yra skirta klinikiniams, technologiniams ir ekonominiams kochlearinės implantacijos aspektams. Įrodyta, kad kochlearinė implantacija yra veiksminga šiuolaikinė priemonė vaikų kurtumo problemoms spręsti (Dettman 2016;Peixoto 2013;Forli 2011). Kochlearinė implantacija ir klausos atkūrimas po operacijos yra labai brangūs, kochlearinio implanto bazinė kaina varijuoja nuo 21 945,09 iki 25 486,56 Eur (LR SAM 2017).…”

Section: įVadasunclassified

Kochlearinė implantacija Lietuvoje: paplitimas ir sistemos apžvalga

Mataitytė-Diržienė

Stumbrys

Byčkova

et al. 2018

STEPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[straipsnis, santrauka, reikšminiai žodžiai lietuvių kalba; santrauka ir reikšminiai žodžiai anglų kalba] Anksčiau atliktų tyrimų rezultatai rodo, kad kochlearinė (klausos) implantacija kartu su nuosekliai įgyvendinama klausos lavinimo programa gali užtikrinti sėkmingą kurčių vaikų socialinę integraciją. Kochlearinė implantacija Lietuvoje atliekama nuo 1998 metų. Iki 2017 metų pabaigos šalyje implantuoti 377 asmenys, dauguma iš jų – vaikai. Daugelis šios srities tyrimų yra skirta klinikiniams ar technologiniams kochlearinės implantacijos aspektams nagrinėti, tačiau trūksta darbų, kuriuose būtų nagrinėjami sveikatos politikos ir socialinės integracijos klausimai. Straipsnyje apžvelgiama dabartinė kochlearinės implantacijos sistema, implantacijų paplitimas ir paciento kelias. Tyrime derinami teisės aktų bei kitų dokumentų analizės ir aprašomosios statistikos metodai. Straipsnio autorių žiniomis, tai pirmas tyrimas, skirtas kochlearinės implantacijos sistemos apžvalgai Lietuvoje.

show abstract

Section: įVadasunclassified

Kochlearinė implantacija Lietuvoje: paplitimas ir sistemos apžvalga

Mataitytė-Diržienė

Stumbrys

Byčkova

et al. 2018

STEPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As reported in several studies, children with profound and severe deafness benefit considerably from cochlear implants (Peixoto et al 2013 ), and most of these children integrate into mainstream schools (Archbold et al 2002 ; Clark 2003 ). Although the cochlear implant does not transform a deaf child into a normal-hearing child, it helps deaf students make gains despite their remaining educational needs and challenges (Chute and Nevins 2006 ; Nevins and Chute 1995 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

School failure in students who are normal-hearing or deaf: with or without cochlear implants

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the impact of cochlear implants on the school failure of deaf who attend mainstream classes by comparing them to their normal-hearing peers as well as deaf without cochlear implants. This case–control study included participants aged 8–18 years. The number of school years failed was obtained from school records. The greatest differences in achievement levels were found between hearing students and those who were deaf without cochlear implants. Cochlear implants provide educational opportunities for hearing-impaired students, yet those without cochlear implants remain at a great disadvantage. These findings suggest that measures promoting greater equity and quality for all deaf students allow achievement levels closer to those of the not impaired.

show abstract

“…Normal speech development is a desirable goal for the family of these patients [2] . Currently, cochlear implants (CIs) are widely accepted for the treatment of severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and since its approval in 1990 by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of deafness in children above 2 years of age, the number of implants in children has been growing tremendously [3] . The indications of cochlear implantation in patients are divided into pre-and postlingual deafness.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Satisfaction of Children with Auditory Neuropathy and Cochlear Implant

Carvalho

Zago²,

Ramos³

et al. 2016

Int Adv Otol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE:In auditory neuropathy (AN) a dyssynchrony in the nerve conduction of the auditory nerve fibers is observed. Typically, patients with AN exhibit moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss, and treatment using cochlear implants (CIs) or hearing aids should be performed as early as possible for a better hearing rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the satisfaction level of patients with AN spectrum disorder treated using CIs. The Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire was selected to evaluate 10 patients with AN treated using CIs. MATERIAL and METHODS:Clinical study of patients with AN spectrum disorder submitted to CI. A retrospective data analysis, genetic and clinical evaluation in a tertiary referral center was done. RESULTS:The means of the subscales for positive effects, services and costs, negative factors, and personal image were 6.15, 4.6, 3.26, and 3.33, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with AN treated using CIs consider themselves satisfied.

show abstract

Effectiveness of cochlear implants in children: Long term results

Cited by 43 publications

References 19 publications

Kochlearinė implantacija Lietuvoje: paplitimas ir sistemos apžvalga

Kochlearinė implantacija Lietuvoje: paplitimas ir sistemos apžvalga

School failure in students who are normal-hearing or deaf: with or without cochlear implants

Satisfaction of Children with Auditory Neuropathy and Cochlear Implant

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About