2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of different alpha lattice designs in the evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in a rainforest agro-ecology

Abstract: Plant breeding experiments require the use of appropriate experimental designs that will efficiently block variation due to wide heterogeneity nature of tropical soils. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of eight different alpha-lattice designs relative to randomized complete block design for evaluating 108 genotypes of maize under rainforest agro-ecology. The maize genotypes were field-tested using three replications at two locations. Data were collected on grain yield and oth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the data of the physicochemical analysis, a completely randomized design (CRD) was applied (25,37), and for the general acceptability, a completely randomized block design (RCBD) (38,39) was carried out to meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. When evaluating the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and identifying if there were significant differences, and in the case of finding significance (p < 0.05), the Tukey test was carried out at a confidence level of 95% (11, 40) using the statistical software R.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the data of the physicochemical analysis, a completely randomized design (CRD) was applied (25,37), and for the general acceptability, a completely randomized block design (RCBD) (38,39) was carried out to meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. When evaluating the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and identifying if there were significant differences, and in the case of finding significance (p < 0.05), the Tukey test was carried out at a confidence level of 95% (11, 40) using the statistical software R.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%