2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2018.10.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects induced by electron beam in methane ices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). These values are close to the experimental ones [30]], in which the period is of the order of 10 s. Generally speaking, it follows from the calculations that the period depends on many parameters of the sample and irradiation, but for the same parameters of the sample, the period decreases with increasing pumping, as noted in Section 2 and observed in our previous experiments [30]. The period of oscillations decreases with G increasing also for oscillations with a large period determined by the time before the outburst.…”
Section: Calculations and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5). These values are close to the experimental ones [30]], in which the period is of the order of 10 s. Generally speaking, it follows from the calculations that the period depends on many parameters of the sample and irradiation, but for the same parameters of the sample, the period decreases with increasing pumping, as noted in Section 2 and observed in our previous experiments [30]. The period of oscillations decreases with G increasing also for oscillations with a large period determined by the time before the outburst.…”
Section: Calculations and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We will present the solutions describing oscillations with a large period and a sharp maximum in the temperature dependence of oscillations on time and oscillations having a short period and located in the vicinity of the maximum oscillations with a long period. This type of dynamics was observed experimentally in [29,30].…”
Section: Calculations and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations