Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals

Güneş, Betül; Yeter, Kübra Yeşildal

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.012

Cited by 40 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…OG had a constant performance in all angles tested probably because at D10 it has a smaller diameter (44/100 mm; Gunes & Yesildal Yeter ) compared to the other files. Moreover, OG was the only unheated file tested and, as a consequence, its cutting surface adapted less to the angulated samples, keeping the active portion of the file unchanged (Vasconcelos et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Cutting efficiency of conventional and heat‐treated nickel–titanium rotary or reciprocating glide path instruments

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To compare the cutting efficiency of several glide path files: HyFlex EDM Glidepath File (HEGF), One G (OG), R‐Pilot (RP) and WaveOne Gold Glider (WOGG) at different cutting inclinations. Methodology Cutting efficiency of 120 new HEGF, OG, RP and WOGG was tested at 90°, 70° and 45° inclination in relation to the sample. Depending on manufacturer instructions, instruments were tested in continuous rotation or reciprocating motion against standardized gypsum samples for 120 s using a customized apparatus. Cutting efficiency was determined by measuring the weight loss and the length of the sample cut. Data were analysed using two‐way analysis of variance and Tukey t‐test (P < 0.05). Results RP and WOGG had greater cutting ability than HEGF and OG in all tested angles. RP tested at 45° had significantly greater cutting efficiency than when tested at 90° and 70° (P < 0.05). OG was not significantly different in terms of cutting ability at 90°, 70° and 45° (P > 0.05). HEGF and WOGG had significantly greater cutting efficiency at 45° and 70° compared to 90° (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between 45° and 70° (P > 0.05). RP had the greatest cutting ability at all tested angles. Conclusions Reciprocating glide path instruments had greater cutting efficiency compared to those in continuous rotation. An inclined insertion (45° or 70°) increased the cutting ability of glide path files except for One G conventional NiTi files.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Cutting efficiency of conventional and heat‐treated nickel–titanium rotary or reciprocating glide path instruments

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Extrusion of a foreign material beyond the apical foramen has been linked with inflammation, occurrence of flare-ups, postoperative pain, delay of healing and long-term treatment failure (5,6). All root canal preparation instruments and techniques are associated with various degrees of apical extrusion and glide path instruments are no exception (7). Manual glide path preparation was associated with significantly greater amount of extruded debris compared to NiTi rotary instruments (7).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Apically extruded debris produced during glide path preparation using R‐Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider and ProGlider in curved root canals

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study aimed to compare the apically extruded debris produced during glide path preparation using R‐Pilot (RP), WaveOne Gold Glider (WGG) and ProGlider (PG) with the subsequent preparation using Reciproc Blue in curved root canals. Mesial roots of mandibular molars with angle of curvature between 25° and 35° were selected (n = 20). The Myers and Montgomery method was used to collect and assess apically extruded debris. The glide path was prepared either manually with K‐file, ProGlider, R‐Pilot or WaveOne Gold Glider. Manual preparation group produced the highest amount of apically extruded debris (P < 0.05), while all groups caused debris extrusion. There were no significant differences among the extruded debris caused by RP, PG and WGG groups (P > 0.05). Apically extruded debris produced by engine‐driven reciprocational or continuous rotational single file glide path instruments was similar, whereas manual glide path preparation was associated with the greatest amount of extruded debris.

show abstract

“…Glide paths are crucial to prevent instrument fracture and to maintain the original root canal anatomy, leading to successful canal shaping (Gunes & Yeter 2018). Glide path preparation can be carried out manually or using engine-driven systems designed exclusively for this purpose.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bending, buckling and torsional resistance of rotary and reciprocating glide path instruments

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To evaluate the bending, buckling and torsional resistance of ProGlider (PG) (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland), R-Pilot (RP) (VDW, Munich, Germany) and WaveOne Gold Glider (WOGG) (Dentsply Sirona). Methodology Ninety instruments were used: 30 PG (size 0.16, .02v taper), 30 RP (size 0.125, .04 taper) and 30 WOGG (size 0.15, .02v taper). The bending resistance test was performed on 10 randomly selected instruments of each system according to ISO 3630-1 specifications. For the buckling resistance test, a loading was applied in the axial direction of each instrument using a universal test machine, with a 20 N cell and 15 mm min À1 speed, in the axial direction. When a lateral elastic displacement of 1 mm occurred, the force was registered. The torsional resistance test was performed according to ISO 3630-1 specifications. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test (P < 0.05). Results WOGG had the lowest bending resistance, whilst RP had the highest bending resistance (P < 0.05). RP also had the highest buckling resistance, and WOGG had the lowest (P < 0.05). PG had intermediate results regarding bending and buckling resistance, with significant differences to RP and WOGG (P < 0.05). RP had the greatest torsional strength and the lowest angular deflection when compared to PG and WOGG (P < 0.05). No differences in the torsional strength and angular deflection were observed between WOGG and PG (P> 0.05). Conclusion The glide path instruments had different behaviours in term of bending, buckling and torsional resistance.

show abstract

Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals

Cited by 40 publications

References 30 publications

Cutting efficiency of conventional and heat‐treated nickel–titanium rotary or reciprocating glide path instruments

Cutting efficiency of conventional and heat‐treated nickel–titanium rotary or reciprocating glide path instruments

Apically extruded debris produced during glide path preparation using R‐Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider and ProGlider in curved root canals

Bending, buckling and torsional resistance of rotary and reciprocating glide path instruments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About