2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1224-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different surgical techniques on mid-distal humeral shaft vascularity: open reduction and internal fixation versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis

Abstract: BackgroundHumeral shaft fractures are generally managed with the conventional posterior open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). This study was aimed at comparing the outcomes of these surgical techniques in terms of the vascular integrity of the mid-distal humeral shaft.MethodsTwelve upper limbs were harvested from 6 fresh cadavers. ORIF or MIPO was randomly performed on either side of each pair of limbs. The axillary artery was perfused with a latex-lead … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been driven by an increasing awareness of the importance of fracture site biology to bone healing . Preservation of local vascularity is a key principle and is maximized by reduced dissection at the fracture site and preservation of the fracture hematoma . When mechanically appropriate, this biological approach has led to an evolution in fracture management from open, direct fracture reduction through open, indirect reduction techniques (such as open but don't touch) to closed, indirect reduction .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been driven by an increasing awareness of the importance of fracture site biology to bone healing . Preservation of local vascularity is a key principle and is maximized by reduced dissection at the fracture site and preservation of the fracture hematoma . When mechanically appropriate, this biological approach has led to an evolution in fracture management from open, direct fracture reduction through open, indirect reduction techniques (such as open but don't touch) to closed, indirect reduction .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of MIPO technique is gradually increasing not only for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures but also for other fractures since it facilitates bone healing process by preserving the biological environment of fracture sites and the technique is easy to perform. 10) Conservative management used to be the gold standard for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Lately, however, the use of operative treatment is increasing for rapid return to daily life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was recently compared to traditional open reduction internal fixation in a large series of mid-distal humerus fractures, with findings of shorter union time and equivalent complication rates in the MIPO group. [56][57][58]…”
Section: Avoiding Hardware Complications With Distal Humeral Orifsingmentioning
confidence: 99%