Effects of Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 supplementation in different energy and crude protein density diets on ileal amino acid digestibility and intestinal shedding of lactobacilli and Escherichia coli in finishing pigs

Zhang, Z.F.; Kim, I.H.

doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.12.015

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Chen et al (2006) observed that the ATTD of DM and N were increased by administration of E. faecium SF68 in finishing pigs. Zhang and Kim (2015) have also found that dietary supplementation with E. faecium DSM 7134 improved apparent ileal digestibility of crude protein and most of indispensable amino acids in finishing pigs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…Dietary treatments included: (1) control, basal diet (CON); (2) basal diet supplemented with 500 mg kg −1 blend of OAs and MCFAs (BOM1); (3) basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg kg −1 blend of OAs and MCFAs (BOM2); (4) basal diet supplemented with 20 mg kg −1 E. faecium DSM 7134 and 500 mg kg −1 blend of OAs and MCFAs (EBOM1); and (5) basal diet supplemented with 20 mg kg −1 E. faecium DSM 7134 and 1000 mg kg −1 blend of OAs and MCFAs (EBOM2). The supplemental doses of E. faecium DSM 7134 and the blend of OAs and MCFAs were modified based on the results of previous studies (Upadhaya et al 2014a;Zhang and Kim 2015). All diets were formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements established by the NRC (2012).…”

Section: Source Of E Faecium and The Blend Of Oas And Mcfasmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most commonly used probiotic species are lactic acid bacteria, such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacteria, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus (Land et al 2005;Gaggìa et al 2010). Previous studies have demonstrated that dietary administration of Enterococcus faecium can improve growth performance and nutrient digestibility in pigs (Chen et al 2006;Malloa et al 2010;Zhang and Kim 2015). We hypothesized that dietary supplementation with E. faecium and blend of OAs and MCFAs may exert better beneficial effects in finishing pigs compared with supplementation of the blend of OAs and MCFAs alone.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effects of a blend of organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids with and without Enterococcus faecium on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, and meat quality in finishing pigs

Lei

Lee

et al. 2018

Can. J. Anim. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An experiment was conducted to assess effects of Enterococcus faecium and a blend of organic acids (OAs) and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) in finishing pigs. A total of 120 pigs [Duroc × (Yorkshire × Landrace); 51.04 ± 1.82 kg] were randomly assigned to five dietary treatments: CON, basal diet; BOM1, CON + 500 mg kg−1 blend of OAs and MCFAs; BOM2, CON + 1000 mg kg−1 blend of OAs and MCFAs; EBOM1, BOM1 + 20 mg kg−1 E. faecium; EBOM2, BOM2 + 20 mg kg−1 E. faecium. Pigs fed EBOM1 and EBOM2 diets had higher average daily gain and average daily feed intake (during days 36–70 and days 1–70) and greater digestibility of dry matter (days 35 and 70) compared with those fed BOM1 and BOM2 diets (P < 0.05). However, no differences on blood parameters and meat quality were observed between pigs offered BOM1 and BOM2 diets and those fed EBOM1 and EBOM2 diets (P > 0.05). In conclusion, supplementation with the combination of E. faecium and a blend of OAs and MCFAs was more effective in improving growth performance and nutrient digestibility than supplementation with blend of OAs and MCFAs alone in finishing pigs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Section: Source Of E Faecium and The Blend Of Oas And Mcfasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of a blend of organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids with and without Enterococcus faecium on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, and meat quality in finishing pigs

Lei

Lee

et al. 2018

Can. J. Anim. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yan et al (2012) also demonstrated that herb extract could stimulate the nutrient digestibility and suggested that the beneficial effects may arise from the activation of digestive enzyme secretion, antibacterial and antioxidant properties (Czech et al 2009). Moreover, improved intestinal microbial balance in our study might have modulated the enterocyte activity and the tissue biological function (Collington et al 1990), thus increased the total metabolism of energy and nutrients Zhang & Kim 2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of benzoic acid, essential oils andEnterococcus faeciumSF68 on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, faecal microbiota and faecal noxious gas emission in weanling pigs

Zhang

Rolando

Kim

2015

Journal of Applied Animal Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A total of 150 weanling pigs (body weight of 8.86 ± 0.93 kg) were used in a 42-day trial to evaluate the efficacy of benzoic acid (BA), essential oils (EO) and Enterococcus faecium SF68. Pigs were randomly distributed into five treatments (six replicates and five pigs per pen): CON, control diet; B5E, CON + 0.5% BA + 0.01% EO; B5SF, CON + 0.5% BA + 7 × 10 8 CFU/kg E. faecium; B3E, CON + 0.3% BA + 0.01% EO; B3SF, CON + 0.3% BA + 7 × 10 8 CFU/ kg E. faecium. During d 8-21 and overall, pigs fed B5E diets showed greater (P < 0.05) average daily gain and gain/feed ratio than CON. The dry matter digestibility in pigs fed B5E diet was increased (P < 0.05) compared with CON at d 21, while the nitrogen digestibility in B5E, B5SF and B3E was increased (P < 0.01) compared with CON. Faecal Lactobacillus counts were increased in B5E, whereas E. coli counts were decreased in B5E and B5SF (P < 0.01) compared with CON. All the supplementation treatments decreased (P < 0.05) the faecal NH 3 , total mercaptans and H 2 S emission. In conclusion, dietary inclusion of 0.5% BA plus 0.01% EO and 7 × 10 8 CFU E. faecium/kg of diet could improve growth performance, decrease faecal E. coli counts, while 0.3% BA combination with EO or E. faecium almost had no effect on the parameters except the decreased faecal noxious gas contents.

show abstract

“…More recently, lactic acid bacteria were proved to be effective in this regard. Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134, a lactic acid bacterium, showed beneficial effects on the apparent ileal digestibility of CP and amino acid, and on intestinal health (Zhang & Kim, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of various additives to enhance growth performance, blood profiles, and reduce malodour emissions in growing pigs

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experiment 1 was a feeding trial in which 75 (LandraceⅹYorkshire)ⅹDuroc pigs with average initial bodyweight (BW) of 26 ± 1 kg were used. It was assigned to three pigs/pen and five pens/treatment. Experiment 2 was a metabolic trial in which 25 (LandraceⅹYorkshire)ⅹDuroc pigs with average initial bodyweight (BW) of 36 ± 1 kg were used. The basal diet consisted of maize (57.71 %), soybean meal (32.45 %), and wheat bran (5 %). Treatments consisted of i) CON (control diet); ii) OE (organic acid + essential oils) (Aviplus-S ® ), that is, CON + 0.05 % OE; iii) OC (organic charcoal) (Olga Black ® ), that is, CON + 0.1 % OC; iv) AE (anise extracts) (RESQ ® ), that is, CON + 0.015 % AE; and v) PB (probiotics) (Bonvital ® ), that is, CON + 0.1 % PB. Average daily gain (ADG) and gain/feed ratio (G : F) were significantly higher in the OE and AE groups than in the others. Average daily feed intake (ADFI) for OE, OC, and AE treatments was significantly higher than that for CON and PB treatments. Dry matter (DM) digestibility was significantly higher in AE than CON. Crude protein (CP) was significantly higher in OE, AE, and PB than CON. CON and other treatments did not cause significant differences in blood l-density lipoprotein (LDL), and glucose. NH 3 emissions were significantly lower in all treated groups than in CON. Among the treatments, NH 3 emissions were lowest in OE and AE. H 2 S emissions were significantly lower in OE, AE, and PB than in CON. Among the treatments, OE and AE were most effective at reducing H 2 S emissions. The emissions of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) showed no significant difference between treatments and CON. In conclusion, this experiment was shown to be more effective on growth performance, malodour emission, blood profiles, and nutrient digestibility in OE and AE than other additives.

show abstract

Effects of Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 supplementation in different energy and crude protein density diets on ileal amino acid digestibility and intestinal shedding of lactobacilli and Escherichia coli in finishing pigs

Cited by 11 publications

References 16 publications

Effects of a blend of organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids with and without Enterococcus faecium on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, and meat quality in finishing pigs

Effects of a blend of organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids with and without Enterococcus faecium on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, and meat quality in finishing pigs

Effects of benzoic acid, essential oils andEnterococcus faeciumSF68 on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, faecal microbiota and faecal noxious gas emission in weanling pigs

Effects of various additives to enhance growth performance, blood profiles, and reduce malodour emissions in growing pigs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About