2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Fusarium mycotoxins on steroid production by porcine granulosa cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
55
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
8
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ERα activation/interactions has been evident at picomolar or nanomolar concentrations using tests covering different steps of the estrogenic response: binding affinity (Takemura et al, 2007), activation of transcriptional activation (Frizzell et al, 2011), proliferation of MCF7 cells (Molina-Molina et al, 2014;Shier et al, 2001) and yeast transfected with ERα (Bovee et al, 2004), as well as results on transcriptional activation (ERα CALUX ® ) and receptor-ligand translocation (ERα redistribution assay), as obtained in this study. Active concentrations (pico to nanomolar range: this study, and studies aforementioned) were found to be much lower than the levels required to alter steroid metabolism (micromolar range, for examples see: (Frizzell et al, 2011;Gracia et al, 2007;Kolle et al, 2012;Ranzenigo et al, 2008;Yang et al, 2007). Interestingly, estrogen may stimulate activities of enzymes of steroidogenesis such as aromatase via ER-mediated regulation (Lee et al, 2012).…”
Section: Tab 2: Computed Results Of Zen and Reduced Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ERα activation/interactions has been evident at picomolar or nanomolar concentrations using tests covering different steps of the estrogenic response: binding affinity (Takemura et al, 2007), activation of transcriptional activation (Frizzell et al, 2011), proliferation of MCF7 cells (Molina-Molina et al, 2014;Shier et al, 2001) and yeast transfected with ERα (Bovee et al, 2004), as well as results on transcriptional activation (ERα CALUX ® ) and receptor-ligand translocation (ERα redistribution assay), as obtained in this study. Active concentrations (pico to nanomolar range: this study, and studies aforementioned) were found to be much lower than the levels required to alter steroid metabolism (micromolar range, for examples see: (Frizzell et al, 2011;Gracia et al, 2007;Kolle et al, 2012;Ranzenigo et al, 2008;Yang et al, 2007). Interestingly, estrogen may stimulate activities of enzymes of steroidogenesis such as aromatase via ER-mediated regulation (Lee et al, 2012).…”
Section: Tab 2: Computed Results Of Zen and Reduced Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been well established that ZEN and metabolites activate estrogen receptors α and β (Bovee et al, 2004;Bravin et al, 2009;EFSA, 2011;Frizzell et al, 2011;Shier et al, 2001;Takemura et al, 2007;WHO, 2000). It has also been suggested that these molecules may alter steroidogenesis (Frizzell et al, 2011;Gracia et al, 2007;Kolle et al, 2012;Ranzenigo et al, 2008;Yang et al, 2007) and may act as an antagonist of the androgenic receptor (Molina-Molina et al, 2014). Undoubtedly, ZEN and metabolites might perturbate several toxicological pathways, but based on the body of available data and reviews from regulatory agencies, the critical effects are thought to result from estrogenic activity mainly through an activation of ERα (EFSA, 2011;Kuiper et al, 1997;WHO, 2000).…”
Section: Tab 2: Computed Results Of Zen and Reduced Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endogenous oestrogens generally inhibit proliferation, stimulate differentiation, and promote apoptosis. According to Ranzenigo et al (2008), phytoestrogens elicit a similar response, whereas small doses of ZEN exert a chemo protective effect, but ZEN in higher doses inhibits the proliferation in specific tissues. Scientific data are scarce in terms of documenting the effect of very low ZEN doses (i.e., No Observed Adverse Effect Level -NOAEL values), and/or less than <40 μg/kg body weight (BW) (Boermans and Leung 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research indicated that feeding feed to gilts contaminated with low concentrations of zearalenone (0.235 to 0.358 ppm) significantly reduced the intrinsic quality of the oocyte collected from these animals (Alm et al, 2006). The level of contamination has dose dependent effects on granulosa cells, steroidogenesis and gene expression Ranzenigo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Giltsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feeding of contaminated feed containing DON (Table 4), as well as decreasing food intake, can influence the immune system (cellular and humoral), effect metabolic disturbances in liver and spleen mainly due to inhibition of RNA, DNA and protein synthesis (Smith and Az-Llano, 2009), and cause reproductive alterations resulting in decreased oocyte and embryo development (Tiemann and Danicke, 2007;Ranzenigo et al, 2008). Prepuberal gilts react more sensitively to DON > ZEA feeding compared to pregnant sows.…”
Section: Desoxynivalenol (Don)mentioning
confidence: 99%