2015
DOI: 10.1080/17408989.2015.1095868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of improved content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge and student performance in physical education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
61
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Teacher content knowledge was perceived to be imperative to facilitate positive student outcomes, which supports previous research in senior-secondary education (Ayres et al, 2004) and more specifically in physical education (Cothran & Kulinna, 2008;Iserbyt, Ward, & Li, 2015;Morgan & Hansen, 2008). Ward (2013) has proposed that teachers who hold deeper content knowledge construct higher quality learning tasks for students as they have deeper understanding of the content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Teacher content knowledge was perceived to be imperative to facilitate positive student outcomes, which supports previous research in senior-secondary education (Ayres et al, 2004) and more specifically in physical education (Cothran & Kulinna, 2008;Iserbyt, Ward, & Li, 2015;Morgan & Hansen, 2008). Ward (2013) has proposed that teachers who hold deeper content knowledge construct higher quality learning tasks for students as they have deeper understanding of the content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In line with Kirk's (2010a) assertion that practical subject matter knowledge (content knowledge and PCK) may facilitate less fragmented approaches to teaching, PSTs felt that it helped them to escape from the rigidity of the lesson plan and respond more effectively to pupils' needs. It was PSTs' perception that the facilitative effects of in-depth content knowledge allowed them to act more creatively in response to the requirements of teaching situations, indicating a positive relationship between content knowledge and PCK (Iserbyt, Ward and Li 2015;Sinelnikov et al 2015). The close link between these two dimensions of knowledge was a consistent theme throughout this investigation, which also endured during the later stages of the training.…”
Section: Then If Within the Lesson My More Able Pupils Are Achievingmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, the specific role that content knowledge has to play in this remains unclear. For instance, Siedentop (2002Siedentop ( /1989) makes direct links between content knowledge and the enacted pedagogical knowledge by using the term PCK (Shulman, 1987); such an association has been supported by more recent studies into the relationship between content knowledge and PCK (Iserbyt, Ward and Martens 2015;Iserbyt, Ward and Li 2015;Ward et al 2015).…”
Section: Figure 1: Conceptualisation Of Shulman's (1987) Knowledge Bamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In Hanuscin (2013), Shulman argues that PCK is a fundamental component of the knowledge base for teaching. Others argue that PCK is part of an academic building that shows interesting ideas related to what and how to teach (Iserbyt et al, 2017;Sagır & Küçükaydın, 2016). From these statements, the authors argue that PCK is an *Address Correspondence: E-mail: suci.nurmatin@gmail.com integration of knowledge content with pedagogy that serve as the basis for carrying out learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%