Effects of input capacity constraints on food quality and regulation mechanism design for food safety management

Chen, You-hua; S, Huang; Mishra, Ashok K.; Wang, X. Henry

doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.03.011

Cited by 38 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature used mathematical modeling as the method mostly cared about food safety governance participation of different subjects. It used game theory to construct the cooperation and game relationship between different governance subjects under the food safety governance environment and between the governance subjects and the governed entities (Chen et al., 2018; Duncan & Claeys, 2018; Zhang et al., 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to the collinear time zone diagram of keywords, the high‐frequency words in the third stage included participation, behavior, knowledge, and sustainability. The research in this period focused on the multi‐subject participation in food safety governance, consumer behavior, food safety education, and sustainable development of food safety (Chen et al., 2018; Ma & Liu, 2019; Nesbitt et al., 2014; Young et al., 2015). Investigation of consumer behavior and their level of education with regard to food safety can help government departments to better understand consumer demand for safe food.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019

Shen

Ming-xia

Sheng

2021

Food Science & Nutrition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the number of food governance‐related studies increased rapidly in the recent decade, the current academic research still lacked systematic integration of food safety governance. To clarify the development trends of research therein, this study summarized research articles concerning food safety governance by the Web of Science Core Collection. An in‐depth bibliometric analysis was then conducted through CiteSpace to summarize the current characters and hot spots of food safety governance research, and predicted future research trends. Results showed that food safety governance was multidisciplinary, which included environmental science, food science, economics, and agriculture. The United States had the largest number of relevant articles, and Wageningen University was the most influential scientific research institution. Among all the journals in this field, Food Policy ranked the first in publication volume and co‐citation frequency. The development of food safety governance research was divided into three processes, namely the separate formulation of the standards for public and private sectors, the joint implementation of these standards, and co‐governance by multiple sectors. The most popular research hot spots in this field were food safety policy integration and public–private partnership of food safety governance. Lower‐ and middle‐income countries focused more on food supply and food system design, and regrettably not on food safety. Higher‐income countries cared more about food safety and food nutrition. Besides, researchers of higher‐income countries also concentrated on consumers' voices in participating in food safety governance. Food safety co‐governance, online food governance, the willingness to buy safe food, and food safety governance under pandemics were considered as future research directions.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019

Shen

Ming-xia

Sheng

2021

Food Science & Nutrition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A larger c means higher product substitutability; thus, in the extreme case, c 1 indicates that the products of the two firms have the same function, whereas c 0 means that each firm has a monopoly on a different product. This type of inverse demand function is widely adopted in economics and in industrial organizations (Chen et al, 2018a;Chen et al, 2018b).…”

Section: Model Establishmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Fee-to-Tax Reform on Water Resources in China

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Resource Tax Law was officially implemented on September 1, 2020, in China. This law presents the “Fee-to-Tax” reform of water resources. This article compares the effects of the “Fee-to-Tax” reform under asymmetric duopoly conditions with perfect information. The mechanisms of the two policies are different when all firms simultaneously respond to water resources: the water resource fee affects output by reducing market size, while the water resource tax reduces output by amplifying the weighted cost difference effects between companies. Water resource taxes work better than fees for eliminating backward production capacity. A comparison of the situation when companies respond sequentially is also carried out. When a low-cost firm is in the leading position, the collection of fees actually reduces the output difference, whereas the tax improves it. When a high-cost firm acts as a leader, the effects depend on the cost difference. When the cost difference between firms is small, the first-move advantage of high-cost firms dominates the cost advantages of low-cost firms. Therefore, a higher tax rate yields a smaller output difference. When cost differences are relatively larger, the cost advantage of low-cost firms dominates the first-move advantage of high-cost firms. As the operational cost for reducing water consumption increases, the reduced water consumption first increases and then decreases.

show abstract

“…In (1), 0   means that the market size and This type of inverse demand function is widely adopted in economics and in industrial organizations (Chen, He, & Paudel, 2018;Chen, Huang, Mishra, & Wang, 2018). Considering the water resource policy, both firms' profits are listed as follows:…”

Section: Model Establishmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Fee-to-Tax Reform on Water Resources in China

Chen

Nie

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Resource Tax Law has been officially implemented on September 1, 2020 in China. This law presents the “Fee-to-Tax” reform of water resources. Methods: This article compares the effects of the “Fee-to-Tax” reform under an asymmetric duopoly with perfect information. Results: First, an analysis when all firms simultaneously respond to the water resource policy is conducted. The mechanisms of the two policies are different: the water resource fee affects output by reducing market size, while the water resource tax reduces output by amplifying the weighted cost difference effects between companies. It is shown that the tax works better than the fee for eliminating backward production capacity. Then, a comparison of the situation when companies respond sequentially is carried out. When a low-cost firm is in the leading position, the collection of fees actually reduces the output difference, whereas the tax improves it. When a high-cost firm acts as a leader, the effects depend on the cost difference. When the cost difference between firms is small, the first-move advantage of high-cost firms dominates the cost advantages of low-cost firms. Therefore, a higher tax rate yields a smaller output difference. Conclusions: When cost differences are relatively larger, the cost advantage of low-cost firms dominates the first-move advantage of high-cost firms. Therefore, the “Fee-to-Tax” reform provides some benefits to maintain the environmental development of some water-mining or related industries.

show abstract

Effects of input capacity constraints on food quality and regulation mechanism design for food safety management

Cited by 38 publications

References 40 publications

A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019

A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019

Analysis of the Fee-to-Tax Reform on Water Resources in China

Analysis of the Fee-to-Tax Reform on Water Resources in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About