Effects of Interactivity on Recall of Health Information: Experimental Study

Abstract

Background Information provided in an interactive way is believed to be engaging because users can actively explore the information. Yet empirical findings often contradict this assumption. Consequently, there is still little known about whether and how interactivity affects communication outcomes such as recall. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate mechanisms through which interactivity affects recall of online health information. We tested whether and how cognitive involvement, perceived active control, and cognitive load mediate the effects of interactivity on recall. In addition, we examined need for cognition and health literacy as potential moderators of the mediation effects. Given the increasing popularity of dietary supplement use, our health website focused on this topic. Methods In an online between-subjects experiment (n=983), participants were randomly assigned to control condition (no interactive features), moderate interactivity (dropdown menus), and high interactivity (dropdown menus and responsive infographics). Two weeks before the experiment, background characteristics and moderating variables were measured. During website visit, data on users’ online behavior were collected. Recall was measured postexposure. Results Participants recalled significantly less information in the moderate (mean 3.48 [SD 2.71]) and high (mean 3.52 [SD 2.64]) interactivity conditions compared with the control condition (mean 5.63 [SD 2.18]). In the mediation analysis, we found direct, negative effects of moderate (b=–2.25, 95% CI –2.59 to –1.90) and high (b=–2.16, 95% CI –2.51 to –1.81) levels of interactivity on recall as well. In the relationship between interactivity and recall, cognitive involvement had a partial negative mediation effect (moderate interactivity: b=–.20; 95% CI –0.31 to –0.10; high interactivity: b=–.21, 95% CI –0.33 to –0.10) and perceived active control had a partial positive mediation effect (moderate interactivity: b=.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.40; high interactivity: b=.27, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.40). Conclusions Interactivity decreased recall. In addition, through interactivity participants were less involved with the content of the information, yet they felt they had more control over the information. These effects were stronger in the high need for cognition and high health literate groups compared with their counterparts.

How Does Social Media Influence People to Get Vaccinated? The Elaboration Likelihood Model of a Person’s Attitude and Intention to Get COVID-19 Vaccines

“…The findings indicated that both H1 and H2 for this study were supported. The findings from this study were consistent in several other studies that employed ELM and tested the direct and indirect effect of the central route, namely information accuracy and information completeness on perceived informativeness and perceived persuasiveness [ 29 , 77 ]. Despite the fact that factorial effect of information accuracy and information completeness have been examined in past studies, most studies conducted are in the realm of marketing and consumer research.…”

Innovation Diffusion: The Influence of Social Media Affordances on Complexity Reduction for Decision Making

“…The mechanism of interactivity affecting cognitive function among users has been demonstrated by various empirical findings. A study conducted on the effect of interactivity of an application on health information found that different interactivity functions affect cognitive involvement and perceived active control, leading to health information recall ( Pajor et al, 2020 ). The ability of interactivity to affect the user’s cognitive load and information recall is the main reason we hypothesized its ability to predict information quality.…”