2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.01.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of JS-K, a novel anti-cancer nitric oxide prodrug, on gene expression in human hepatoma Hep3B cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with a recent report that luteolin, a common dietary flavonoid, induces the ER stress response and mitochondrial dysfunction by increasing intracellular ROS levels in glioblastoma cells [40]. Another study reported that JS-K, a glutathione S transferase (GST)-activated nitric oxide (NO) donor prodrug, promotes apoptosis by inducing ROS production in human prostate cancer cells [41]. It was shown that arsenic sulfide induces apoptosis and autophagy through the accumulation of ROS in osteosarcoma cells [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This finding is consistent with a recent report that luteolin, a common dietary flavonoid, induces the ER stress response and mitochondrial dysfunction by increasing intracellular ROS levels in glioblastoma cells [40]. Another study reported that JS-K, a glutathione S transferase (GST)-activated nitric oxide (NO) donor prodrug, promotes apoptosis by inducing ROS production in human prostate cancer cells [41]. It was shown that arsenic sulfide induces apoptosis and autophagy through the accumulation of ROS in osteosarcoma cells [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Based on this information, cell viability and colony formation assays were used in this research to emphasize the impact of the RSNO, GSNO on N2a neuroblastoma cells. Similar to previous studies [25][26][27][28][29]32,33], direct and indirect effects of NO were analyzed collectively (not distinguished) in this work. These experiments showed that after 24 h of exposure to GSNO, 21-24% of cells were no longer metabolically active and 100% were incapable of colony formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although NO concentration can be directly manipulated, it is more challenging to control release kinetics and site-specific delivery of NO. To address these challenges various delivery platforms have been explored [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Endothelial progenitor cells exposed to laminar flow, a known activator of eNOS, upregulated NO concurrent with downregulation of TSP1 protein (7). In contrast to these results in primary vascular and renal cells, treatment of human hepatoma3 B cancer cells with the NO prodrug O2-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) 1-[(4-ethoxyxarbonyl)piperazin-1-yl] diazen-1-ium 1,2-diolate (1 to 10 lM) increased TSP1 mRNA expression and cell surface expression of the TSP1 receptor CD36 (44). Conversely, treatment of NIH 3T3 cells with high concentrations of NO (1 mM DETA/NO) for 24 h suppressed TSP2 promoter activity and mRNA (149).…”
Section: E No Regulation Of Tsp1 Expressionmentioning
confidence: 65%